In traditional analyses, words in literal expressions denote what they mean according to common or dictionary usage, while words in figurative expressions connote additional layers of meaning. When the human ear or eye receives the message, the mind must interpret the data to convert it into meaning. This involves the use of a cognitive framework which is made up of memories of all the possible meanings that might be available to apply to the particular words in their context. This set of memories will give prominence to the most common or literal meanings, but also suggest reasons for attributing different meanings, e.g., the reader understands that the author intended it to mean something different.
For example, the words, "The ground is thirsty and hungry," mixes usages. The ground is not alive and therefore does not need to drink or have the essence of life to be able to obtain the characteristics needed to eat. The reader can immediately understand that a literal interpretation is not appropriate and confidently interpret the words to mean "the ground is dry": The stimulus that would trigger the sensation of thirst in a living organism. But a sentence, "When I first saw her, my soul began to quiver," is more difficult to interpret. It might mean, "When I first saw her, I began to fall in love," or, "When I first saw her, I began to panic," or something else entirely. Whereas the ground's thirst can only sensibly refer to its dryness, the soul may quiver to represent a whole range of feelings, including mutually exclusive ones. Only someone familiar with the speaker's feelings could accurately interpret this statement. A different way of expressing the difficulty is that, without a context, a few words can only be given a provisional set of meanings, the most appropriate only becoming apparent when more information is made available.
Classical and traditional linguistics by some counts identified more than two hundred and fifty different figures of speech. More recently, some have reduced the list to more manageable proportions; others have claimed to be able to classify all figurative language as either metaphor or metonymy.
2007-01-31 19:58:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by bribri75 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is when you say something as a "figure of speech," the listener or reader knows what you mean something else. You call somebody a pack rat, it doesn't mean he's a rat, it means he collects and stores stuff. You say, "This organization is a rudderless ship," you mean it has no direction.
2007-01-31 14:39:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by The First Dragon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
figurative language includes similes, metaphors, personification, imagery, etc. It is a way of writing more descriptively and in a higher level.
2007-01-31 14:48:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by rbrulesamanda 2
·
0⤊
0⤋