English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is the US government a legal entity that can be named as a victim of a crime? Of this sort of crime, in specific? Just wondering, because of a link that was suggested to me, that seems to do just this sort of thing.

2007-01-31 13:48:48 · 4 answers · asked by starryeyed 6 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

No.


Slander Law and Legal Definition

Slander is the oral communication of false statements that are harmful to a person's reputation. If the statements are proven to be true, it is a complete defense to a charge of slander. Oral opinions that don't contain statements of fact don't constitute slander. Slander is an act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation. Slander is a subcategory of defamation.

The basic elements of a claim of slander include;

1. a defamatory statement;
2. published to third parties; and
3. which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.

Slander is primarily covered under state law, but is subject to First Amendment guarantees of free speech. The scope of constitutional protection extends to statements of opinion on matters of public concern that do not contain or imply a provable factual assertion. If the slander unjustly accused you of a crime or reflected on your profession, the court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of slander you generally must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.

Slander of title is a common law tort involving a disparaging remark regarding ownership of property. It affects the owner's ability to transfer the property, resulting in a monetary loss.

2007-01-31 14:06:41 · answer #1 · answered by Peter Pumpkin Eater 5 · 2 0

If he did that, then i could completely advise that his fighters bombard him with frivolous courtroom circumstances the way human beings did to Sarah Palin. heavily, what's faulty with you human beings? Are you extremely so youthful which you do no longer understand that each and every single president in the historic past of the U.S. has had his proportion of human beings who oppose him? Do you extremely no longer comprehend that Saturday evening stay has spoofed each and every president? Or that there'll continually be political cartoons that take at present admin's rules? in case you want to do away with loose speech, you're able to remorseful approximately it. What if the subsequent president is one which you despise? do you need to've the liberty to sentence his movements? Or do you have to be jailed for it?

2016-11-23 18:58:24 · answer #2 · answered by becher 3 · 0 0

I could be wrong, but I would think that would fall under Free Speech.

2007-01-31 13:56:38 · answer #3 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0 0

no

2007-01-31 14:17:34 · answer #4 · answered by glamour04111 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers