Im giving up Nash Yao and Mark Blount and getting Chris Paul Duncan and Webber....and i sorta need forwards and i have decent guards.....potins system where fg% ft% and 3pt% dotn count....1 point for points 3s rebs blocks steals -1 for turnovers and 2 for an assist
2007-01-31 13:20:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I dont think you should due to Tim Duncan's recurring plantar fascitis problems, Paul is out, and C-Webb just got on with Detroit, a system where no one player can really post enormous stats. Nash sets your team up with assits, when Yao gets back he is a very reliable 20-10 big man. Blount is alright, If I were you I'd look in Free Agents for a replacement for him though.
2007-01-31 15:01:10 · answer #1 · answered by Ruiz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would do it. Yao is out for another 5 weeks and this is crunch time if you want to get into the playoffs. Mark Blount is a dud and has never put up big stats. Nash is great and will get better but Webber's first game as a Piston wasent so bad [23p,13r,4b]. Chris Paul is great and fills out the stat sheet in assists, steals and points. Tim Duncan is the most consistant play in the NBA and is getting more assist now that Ginobili is on fire. Also, Duncan is great in turnovers, just one a game!
Hope I helped!
2007-01-31 15:48:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would. you're basically giving up nash for paul/duncan/cwebb...
yao will hardly play in regular season, blount's little hot streak is over, and I think that cwebb is starting at center, so he should get the center eligibility soon. your assts will take a hit, obviously, but paul is back as of tonight (rotten line, but still back) so that should shore them up a bit. duncan is great and if you don't count ft%, all the better. your to's will also get worse, but there's not much you can do about that, and nash's to's are probably close to timmyd and paul combined per game. pull the trigger!
2007-01-31 17:48:14 · answer #3 · answered by prekinpdx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way. Nash is obviously way better than paul. Yao has been good till he was injured, but should be back aftrer the All-star game. Also, Blount has been good at C for the wolves, and is better than webber/
2007-02-04 07:03:15 · answer #4 · answered by yahskaraghu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Paul is due back so short term its Nash and Blount for Paul Duncan and C-Web. Looks like a pretty good deal to me.
2007-02-01 04:27:26 · answer #5 · answered by frigon_p 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i wouldnt. you dont give up nash, he is too valuable. once yao comes back he will be more valuable than either duncan or webber. and webber is on the decline and isnt a good fantasy player anymore.
2007-01-31 17:21:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by what? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
nash>paul
Yao (when healthy)>duncan
blount
the guy finding out to purchase and advertising Howard and Lewis is getting a bad deal. Howard is palms down, the main dominant center in the NBA, and Rashard Lewis is very almost a assured precise-20 participant. I completely have self belief that Lebron is the terrific participant in basketball, yet you may only be giving up too lots to get him.
2016-09-28 06:25:19 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would do, Yao is hurt and out for a month still
2007-02-01 01:06:06 · answer #8 · answered by christerosterling 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Why? Who knows
2007-01-31 19:14:16 · answer #9 · answered by jdog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't Good luck
2007-02-03 14:44:13 · answer #10 · answered by styles4u 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋