Is George W Bush actually Osama Bin Laden..cleverly disguised by the CIA?

Question

Maybe he is actually a LESBIAN...with a taco implanted in his ears

Answer 1

I think you're right. That may explain why I could never understand what he's saying.

He must be sending coded messages to the other terrorists

Answer 2

It does seem odd that anytime George gets into trouble.We get a video from Bin Laden.

Answer 3

The failure to absorb Iraq's lessons has been evident in the neoconservative discussion of how to deal with Iran's growing regional power, and its nuclear programme. Iran today constitutes a huge challenge for the US, as well as for America's friends in the Middle East. Unlike al-Qaida, Iran is a state, deeply rooted historically (unlike Iraq) and flush with resources as a result of energy price rises. It is ruled by a radical Islamist regime that - particularly since Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's election in June 2005 - has turned in a disturbingly intolerant and aggressive direction.

The US unintentionally abetted Iran's regional rise by invading Iraq, eliminating the Ba'athist regime as a counterweight, and empowering Shia parties close to Tehran. It seems reasonably clear that Iran wants nuclear weapons, despite protestations that its nuclear programme is only for civilian purposes; nuclear energy makes little sense for a country sitting on some of the world's largest oil reserves, but it makes sense as the basis for a weapons programme. It is completely rational for the Iranians to conclude that they will be safer with a bomb than without one.

It is easy to outline the obstacles to a negotiated end to the Iranian programme, but much harder to come up with an alternative strategy. Use of force looks very unappealing. The US is hardly in a position to invade and occupy yet another country, especially one three times larger than Iraq. An attack would have to be conducted from the air, and it would not result in regime change, which is the only long-term means of stopping the WMD programme. It is hard to have much confidence that US intelligence on Iranian facilities is any better than it was in the case of Iraq. An air campaign is much more likely to build support for the regime than to topple it, and will stimulate terrorism and attacks on American facilities and friends around the globe. The US would be even more isolated in such a war than during the Iraqi campaign, with only Israel as a certain ally.

None of these considerations, nor the debacle in Iraq, has prevented certain neoconservatives from advocating military action against Iran. Some insist that Iran poses an even greater threat than Iraq, avoiding the fact that their zealous advocacy of the Iraq invasion is what has destroyed America's credibility and undercut its ability to take strong measures against Iran.

All of this could well be correct. Ahmadinejad may be the new Hitler; the current negotiations could be our Munich accords; Iran could be in the grip of undeterrable religious fanatics; and the west might be facing a "civilisational" danger. I believe that there are reasons for being less alarmist. Iran is, after all, a state, with equities to defend - it should be deterrable by other states possessing nuclear weapons; it is a regional and not a global power; it has in the past announced extreme ideological goals but has seldom acted on them when important national interests were at stake; and its decision-making process appears neither unified nor under the control of the most radical forces.

What I find remarkable about the neoconservative line of argument on Iran, however, is how little changed it is in its basic assumptions and tonalities from that taken on Iraq in 2002, despite the momentous events of the past five years and the manifest failure of policies that neoconservatives themselves advocated. What may change is the American public's willingness to listen to them.

Answer 4

I heard of George Bush being a Chimp, Druggie, woman beater, draft dodger, illiterate, alcoholic.......and now this is a new Usama Bin Laden.....LOL...yeah right,bud!


He is the best man to walk this great big planet earth we call home, we will see this further down the years. When citizens will re-account the days of his term, and appreciate his vision.

Answer 5

I can see the wonders the Canadian mental health system has done.

Any question here in the US why socialized medicine doesn't work... here's proof!

Answer 6

I don't think the American people could have done any worse if they had elected osama Bin Laden!!!

Answer 7

No, but wasn't Osama's family bankrolling Bush in his failed oil businesses?

Answer 8

I thought they were Paris Hilton.The truth of the matter is that she is every idiot.

Answer 9

Wow Never thought of that.Tell me more

Answer 10

Wow, that's a really great question based totally in fact.