2007-01-31 12:55:55 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He's a man, he likes women. What's so perverted, getting his cigar pre-moistened? I imagine you only have sex in the missionary position.
2007-01-31 13:04:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
I don't understand your point, not everyone divorces after infidelity. The Clintons apparently have gotten past it, why are you so concerned? If being a lawyer, the First Lady and being a Senator are not qualifications, then what are? Being an actor? (Ronald Reagan) maybe a body builder, actor AND infamous groper (Arnold Schwarzenneger) maybe a slave trader and alcoholic (Andrew Jackson), a cocaine using, drunk driving idiot? (Bush) Even one of our greatest presidents John F. Kennedy was a known philanderer. If the fact that Hillary chose to forgive her husband and keep her marriage together negates all her qualifications, then your reasoning is rather skewed!
2007-01-31 21:55:13 · answer #2 · answered by alessa_sunderland 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's "Rodham" - and if her hubby is a pervert then so are 72% of the male population and 51% of the females..those are 2005 statistics on cheating spouses in your average American marriage....Google it! And think about how you would like to have lived in that house after all that nonsense....how would you like to have Hillary on your butt 24/7.... It's their marriage, they make it work and it was none of our business in the first place.
2007-02-01 01:47:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Google or Yahoo "arkancide" before you decide anything about her or Bull Clinton.
She is a Socialist and has utter contempt of America just as her traitourous masturbating husband.
He masturbated his "knobbie" in the oval office using a fat female. He also has contempt of women. Juanita Brodderick say she was raped by Bull Clinton. I read her story, I do not believe she was lying.
He and Hillary are the Rosenberg of modern America.
2007-01-31 21:52:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, she's also a graduate of Yale Law School, where she served on the Board of Editors of Yale Review of Law and Social Action and worked with underprivileged children.
She served as staff attorney for the Children's Defense Fund, and as a consultant to the Carnegie Council on Children.
She was a member of the presidential impeachment inquiry staff advising the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives during the Watergate Scandal. Following this, Ms. Rodham later became a faculty member (one of only two women in the faculty) at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville School of Law.
President Jimmy Carter appointed Mrs. Clinton to the board of the Legal Services Corporation in 1978.
In 1988 and 1991, the National Law Journal named Clinton one of the 100 most influential lawyers in America.
In 2006, she carried the state of New York by 67% to a second term in the U.S. Senate.
2007-01-31 21:18:53 · answer #5 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋
I would be hard pressed to list her qualifications - but that certainly would not be one of them.
As far as I can see, she "dealt" with him by ignoring him - before, after and during his affairs with other women, a habit which started back in Arkansas before he became governor, while he was governor, before he became President, while he was President -
if that's her version of dealing with things, she certainly has no business in the Oval Office.
2007-01-31 21:03:06 · answer #6 · answered by Uncle John 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
For all those libs praising Hilary qualifications don't forget she served on the Board of Directors of Wal-Mart, or don't you want to bring that up.
Let's fave it she just another crook and do we want that again.
2007-01-31 21:49:16 · answer #7 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I know what you mean.Having a husband being an adult er.Could you imagine Being married to a man that invades country to gain oil.That is right getting head is ten times worse then getting thousands of soldiers killed.
2007-01-31 21:57:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I know of no other American presidents who were qualified for the job because they were able to deal with their pervert husbands, so I would say no.
2007-01-31 21:37:24 · answer #9 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wow, great question.
Really, her only qualification is she was married to Bill Clinton. Other than that, nothing. She knows it too. Watch how nervous she gets working a room of average Americans. She despises them, yet she is aware they are every bit as qualified as she is to be president.
the American public won't choose her.
I get the idea she knows that too.
2007-01-31 21:08:13 · answer #10 · answered by American Bad Ass 1 · 5⤊ 3⤋
she really doesn't have many qualifications. The way she dealt with her husband has negatively impacted her political chances.
Besides, I don't think we want the same two families running our country decade after decade. Let's try something new.
2007-01-31 21:21:54 · answer #11 · answered by martinmagini 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋