English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm getting a 2001 Ford Ranger 3.0L for a work truck for dirt cheap and I would like to build the engine a little. Its comes stock 150 HP.
Does anyone know how many horses I can gett out of it with just
bolt-on performance parts? I have a 4.6L but I'm saving it for something else. I carry some heavy tools in my truck so I need more muscle...like over 200 HP if its possible. I'm not looking to put a turbo charger on it, at least not yet.

2007-01-31 12:42:37 · 11 answers · asked by B 3 in Cars & Transportation Maintenance & Repairs

11 answers

A 3.0L is around 183 cubic inches. It's very easy to get 183 horsepower out of the engine. The absolute theoretical horsepower you can get is 4 per cubic inch but due to heat and friction loses etc., you can't do it. With roller rockers, roller lifters, cam, polished ports, large exhaust and a computer chip, you can bump your horsepower up to about 225. Nitrous, a turbo, compression increase, and other speed shop add ons, you can get up to about 360 hp but anything more is going to start being very costly.

2007-01-31 13:57:26 · answer #1 · answered by notadeadbeat 5 · 0 0

To get to around 200 Hp in your truck it would take about 1250-1500 bucks. The cheapest and best way is a programmer, module, or chip (They are around 300. They all do the same thing....They increase fuel and air, and timing ect. You can get those at www.jetchip.com or look for superchips namebrand. Another quick fix that is cheap is a KandN airfilter they are about 50 bucks. As for the cold air intake. Those are around 250-300 and arent worth it cause they might give you 4-5 Hp and they actually decrease torque and Hp at low RPMs and Increase HP and TQ at high RPMs since most people who buy this are into high-revving sport compacts. Now when you are halling you need more low RPM power.The jetchip or programmer would give you about 15-17 Hp and 24 torqe. And to hall stuff around you really need torque

2007-01-31 13:54:23 · answer #2 · answered by EricJohn004 2 · 0 0

The best thing to do is look for a power programmer to open up the most power gains on what you have. Another way to open up a motor for cheap is changing the cam and throttle body. With doing so, I would have the heads ported and polished. Look for another manifold and install some dual exhaust. Also look into a new air intake system. All of those would easily boost you to around the 275-325 range. Depending on the type of performance you are looking into get.

2007-01-31 12:55:49 · answer #3 · answered by italian goddess 2 · 0 1

2001 Ford Ranger Horsepower

2016-11-06 23:54:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ford Ranger is one of the WORST vehicles if you want performance. I would trade up to something with more power rather than waste my money trying to turn a Ranger into a Supercar.

2007-01-31 14:39:57 · answer #5 · answered by forgivebutdonotforget911 6 · 0 0

A jillion! Any mods you make to that motor will destroy it in the long run. You can get plenty of HP if you want a truck that will only run for 50k miles. Buy a sports car.

2007-01-31 13:41:07 · answer #6 · answered by Mike Hunt 5 · 0 0

With bolt on parts.... 200 HP max.

2007-01-31 12:51:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well it all depends on you want to do.A cold air intake will add 10-15,a chip 5-10.But I would say don't waste your time or money on a 3.0....gl.

2007-01-31 12:47:52 · answer #8 · answered by JACK OF TRADES 3 · 1 0

you can fit a 454 in the ranger if you take out teh heater core. =)but i wouldnt put any money into a ranger, it typically is a black hole, you dont get it back. do small things like intake, exhaust, pulleys...

2007-01-31 13:39:36 · answer #9 · answered by seanisbond 1 · 1 0

it somewhat is in all probability the lengthiest question i've got ever seen on right here. lol My wide-unfold e book is The Deathly Hallows. each and each of different relationships between each and each of different characters finally comes jointly. you eventually get to be certain why Snape treats Harry they way he does, you get to be certain why he screams "do no longer call ME A COWARD" while he's working removed from Harry. You get to be certain that incredibly plenty everythin that occurs to Harry for the duration of each and all of the books has been component of the grasp plan by employing Dumbledore. it somewhat is a terrific e book and the only e book i've got ever sat and examine the finished way by way of, no breaks - different than for making extra tea to help me stay wide awake. 2. i might have the invisibility cloak, the stone may well be ineffective - the folk do no longer quite come back, and the elder wand might recommend you in no way get an uncomplicated life, plus - might desire to you have opened Dubmbledore's tomb to get it? Neither might desire to I. 3. Mrs. Weasley. in simple terms for the final combat while she in simple terms approximately knocks Harry over working to combat Bellatrix and screaming "no longer my daughter you *****". type. 4. a. Snape, until eventually the suitable e book. b. Lockhart, the guy is a suitable nutcase. 5. i for my section think of Minerva Mogonogal, reliable and a terrific spell caster. 6. Expecto Patronum. i might like to be certain what my "potential animal" may well be. 7. Luna Lovegood. hilarious and quirky. i admire the way she and Harry connect while no-one believes him relating to the thestrals. 8. maximum persons are going to assert Dumbledore right here, yet his dying became into planned before so i do no longer think of I consider that one. i think of the dying that affected me maximum for my section became into Dobby the abode elf. He might have carried out something for Harry Potter and his acquaintances, his dying became into so tragic, distinctly seeing because it became into the comparable killer as whom killed Sirius. 9. Proffesor Lupin (in the books, in the flicks he became into rubbish) and his D.A.D.a sort, the bogart transforming into snape became into type. 10. Dumbledore palms down. suitable wizard who ever lived.

2016-12-17 06:47:10 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers