In my mind there is a difference between being a celebrity (famous for being rich, a socialite, talk show host, hanger on, etc...) and being an artist (singer, writer, actor, director, etc...) Celebs have the art of self-promotion and timing and are not necessarily known for their quality of work or their work ethic. Can anything Paris Hilton does be called 'excellent'?. Artists, however, have drive, passion, dedication and talent. Look at Helen Mirren, Steven Speilburg, J.K. Rowling, for examples, they are the ones who deserve to be emmulated.
2007-01-31 13:40:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Viewaskew 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the worldwide was once a greater effectual place with out this entire movie star lifestyle occurring. you probably did no longer have the likes of Sky and residing television and certainty exhibits. It develop into all good previous shaped entainment, and human beings had skills (different than for Samantha Fox). Rehab wasn't particularly heard of except somebody had a actual concern and there have been no sleek movie star gossip magazines. And it wasn't 'renowned' to be a single mum as those celebs seem to propose the certainty which you've got a baby and nonetheless proceed to occasion. those prosperous childrens particularly are a bad occasion to at present's impressionable teenage females.
2016-11-02 00:19:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ridinger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
MOST Celebrities have talent. If you don't have talent, forget it. I myself have ART talent, but that isn't going to get me on the big screen, on on the radio. If you can sing, or play an instrument VERY exceptionally well, or can act to save your life, then you could become a celebrity, and remember, after all their hard work and effort, THAT is what gets them MORE money and fame.
2007-01-31 13:44:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by hammettgoddess 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Celebrities are famous because they have talents that people love, so they entertain, and get payed. So some people might have special talents, they just havent been discovered. Overall, they dont just make people famous for nothing, even Paris Hilton, she is an entertainer because she is good at doing stupid stuff and making people talk! Peace out. Luv/Kodi
2007-01-31 13:33:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kodi F 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
People who hire actors and actresses, after a few screen tests, can tell if the person has the right "talent" to become a successful actor or actress. You either have it, or you do not.
That is what auditions are for.
2007-01-31 12:50:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think most "celebrities" are talentless hacks that are being milked by promoters who will soon discard said celebrity for the next big thing.
People with talent, real talent, are refered to by their art or calling. Actor, Singer, Musician, Chef....etc.
2007-01-31 12:38:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by DJ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's all about being in the right place at the right time.
2007-01-31 12:35:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by jare bare 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think one thing most of them have is a major desire to do whatever it is they do.
They'll do anything, give up anything, sacrifice anything.
I on the other hand don't have that "one-dimensional-focus".
2007-01-31 12:46:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by daljack -a girl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
simple...fans! You can have money, talent, and an agent. If you don't have fans, you aren't a celebrity. You have to be celebrated.
2007-01-31 13:44:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ap 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Charisma, and a little bit of luck.
2007-01-31 13:10:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by mommasquarepants 4
·
0⤊
0⤋