English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We cant nuke the Islamic world, its against "our values".

Nooo, we gotta send our boys over there as "sercurity patrols", after all, thats the moral thing to do, we dont want to harm "innocent" insurgents...i mean civilians who aid and support the insurgents and hate us, we cant hurt any of them.

After all people, war is a clean thing and we must fight it cleanly, otherwise...WE AUTOMATICALLY BECOME JUST LIKE THEM...AND ALL SLOPES ARE SLIPPERY...ALLLL

Seriously now, if we nuked the Islamic world, I would think:

Hmmm, did that serve our interests? Does it protect us? Hmmm....yes yes yes. The end. No guily. Bye bye savage savage humanity destroying culture. Good riddance.

2007-01-31 12:09:23 · 14 answers · asked by PragmaticMan 1 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

1) Radioactive fallout would spread around much of the world.
2) It would kill a lot of innocent camels & goats.
3) ??? Sorry I can't think of anything else.

2007-01-31 12:13:33 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 16 3

Nooo, we gotta send our boys over there as "sercurity patrols"
-Thought that was Bush, and a Republican majority congress who sent us to Iraq? A little forgetful are we?

war is a clean thing
-Please refer to WWI, Vietnam, U.S. Civil War, then try come back with this same position.

ALL SLOPES ARE SLIPPERY
- You wanna play the "slippery slope" card do you? Let's play...

Ok, so we nuked the Muslim world (Which by proxy, you'd have to nuke parts of the U.S., Muslims live here too, we call them Americans), who's next, North Korea looks suspiscious, and Hugo Chavez isn't too fond of America (Well, just Bush) BANG!! No more threats right?
China's rising eonomic power could be a threat to our supremacy.... BANG!!! BANG!!!!
Oh, there's a few countries (Europe) that are kinda mad at us for nuking a billion Muslims they might retaliate... BANG!!! Preemptive strike! We can't let them bring the fight here.
Hmmm... some Americans are upset over are actions, they might revolt....BANG!!! We will leave only "patriots" to live in the land of the free.

Ahhh we're safe now.... OH **** RUSSIA! BOOOOOMMM! The U.S. is no more...

An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind- Mahatma Ghandi

2007-01-31 12:38:07 · answer #2 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 1 0

Bombing and violently murdering an entire country of people? Yeah, that would make us just as horrible as the terrorists. Nice. Remember Hitler? He had an entire culture of people killed because he didn't like them or agree with them. I don't know about you, but I don't want to be compared to Hitler.

Not to mention that killing innocent civilians is sick. And completely against the "conservative" Christian beliefs.

Your question is ignorant and hateful.

And everything Mikelew007 said.

2007-01-31 13:32:50 · answer #3 · answered by Laci R 3 · 0 0

i personally have thought that a succession of about 5 or 6 nuke warheads one after another with slightly overlapping damage ranges to ensure wiping everything off the whole middle east except the cockroaches an excellent plan.

the whole region sucks, period. we aren't so hot ourseves and the world hates us but the middle east and the islam ic world cause too many headaches.

all organized religion-not just islam-has caused far more suffering and anguish that it has saved souls and helped people through time. simple fact.

2007-01-31 12:16:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The islamics that would remain would come after the USA. USA will aid them money (because that is how dumb our nation is) and they will blow us to peices with our own money by buying bombs from world superpowers that would be aginst the USA because their countries contain large amounts of islamic populations and got angry over us nuking them. Ha.

2007-01-31 12:15:26 · answer #5 · answered by Brittany I 2 · 2 0

Salaams, Colonisation and oppression in particular by skill of the British yet in addition by skill of the Dutch, Spanish, French and Portuguese. maximum Muslim countries have had Independence for decrease than 60 years.

2016-09-28 06:21:48 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm not sure I fully understand your statements, which are a bit erratic, but it is WRONG to nuke the Islamic world or any part of the world.

2007-01-31 12:13:25 · answer #7 · answered by darth_maul_8065 5 · 4 0

Nuke the domestic terrorists first, and if that goes well... then we can talk about the Middle-East.

2007-01-31 12:19:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

... if u start cutting nukes loose there is no way to predict the results of who would retaliate against who ... you would likely spark a worldwide nuclear exchange ... brilliant thinking.

2007-01-31 12:15:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

The USA is getting EXACTLY what it deserves in IRAQ

Perhaps you should nuke yourselves...the usa is sick arrogant and pathetic

2007-01-31 12:33:36 · answer #10 · answered by T - blaster 1 · 1 1

Poor excuse for a human being there pal.

2007-01-31 12:12:57 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers