Terms limits or Public Financing?
2007-01-31 11:02:07 · 5 answers · asked by Mason 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Both--- Actually, there already is public financing to a degree. Candidates get matching public funds.
I'd also place limits on funds to keep it even + grant equal airtime. the airwaves are technically public property and licensed to broadcasters. As PSA type thing, they need to grant time to candidates.
AZ also has a clean elections system that controls/regulates camaign financing.
2007-01-31 11:06:22 · answer #1 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. I'm actually not interested in competitive elections per se. Finding the best person is more important than giving less qualified people a 'fair chance'.
2007-01-31 12:04:04 · answer #2 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
public financing
2007-01-31 11:09:49 · answer #3 · answered by fred9232 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am thinking of getting rid of the Electoral College.
2007-01-31 11:19:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
HOW ABOUT LETTING AN AVERAGE AMERICAN BE PRESIDENT I'M SICK RICH PEOPLE BEING OUR PRESIDENT THEY ARE NOT IN TOUCH WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ONLY BIG BUSINESS WHICH IS RUINING OUR COUNTRY.
2007-01-31 12:00:28 · answer #5 · answered by jason s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋