English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For instance the CEO of General Motors has said that $1500 of every new car is the cost to insure the employees and retiree's. I think this could be applied to many different industrys and we all pay for it when we buy something. This also makes it hard for American companays to compete in a global market as so many have universal health care. This is a contributer for jobs going oversea's. Do you have any other examples of how it cost not having U.H.C.

2007-01-31 10:13:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

Examples of hidden cost....

- Crime. Desperate ppl will do desperate things they never dreamed they were capable of... Ever see that movie 'John Q'? The one where they guy takes hostages in the hospital just to get his son's name on the list for a heart transplant... he was refused because his insurance didn't cover it. This sort of thing is not far from the truth. Ppl will rob, cheat, steal, etc... to save the life of a loved one.

- More ppl in prison. I read about a girl once that had never committed a crime. She had ovarian cysts and was sick all the time. She robbed a convenience store and then waited outside for the police. When she went to court, she explained to the judge that she was so sick you couldn't function but no doctor would see her in that she couldn't pay and was uninsured. She said she figured she sacrifice a couple years of her life in prison in order to be able to live out the rest of her life. Btw, you get healthcare if you are in state custody... jail, etc...

- Taxpayers pick up the tab from the uninsured beating down the doors of ER units.

2007-01-31 14:08:35 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 2 2

particular, it may be hard to establish all the hidden expenses, yet this might additionally be actual of turning over our wellness care gadget to the government. only call one ingredient they havent screwed up. the familiar motives wellness care is so costly are: valuable exertions unions that jack up expenses in places like GM and set the value common for those human beings that are no longer so blessed; a criminal occupation that artwork over the wellness gadget for earnings; a scientific occupation that limits their numbers with the intention to maintain earnings severe. Do you no longer comprehend that each and every physique of those valuable forces might have a a lot greater effective voice in a central authority gadget than you do? We have been given a ideas-blowing present day by using the founding fathers, a constitutionally constrained republic. They have been sensible sufficient to establish that each and every means, in spite of the undeniable fact that nicely intentioned, given to the government grew to become into additionally one which ought to, and unavoidably could, be used against the ruled. This has been nicely typical thruout historic past. we've foolishly allowed the government to anticipate powers some distance previous those constitutionally authorized. the end result: the standard individual works via the middle of might each year till now he earns a dime it quite is his very own, and for what? only a small quantity of that is going for national protection to guard us from the undesirable adult men, between the few issues the government is legally allowed to do. the rest is of little or no fee to the standard working individual. we are able to all be greater valuable served if we take duty for our very own wellness care quite of procuring for into the delusion that the government will take care human beings whilst they make a muck of each and every thing.

2016-11-23 18:29:19 · answer #2 · answered by chapdelaine 4 · 0 0

We're already paying for uninsured people. Those who can't afford, or not able to get insurance for other reasons, are going to the doctor and hospital just like the rest of us. It's not like they don't get sick. Who is paying right now? Taxpayers. But because we don't have a system designed for it, it costs many times over what it would if we had universal healthcare.

I'll never really understand why some people oppose a universal healthcare policy.

2007-01-31 10:21:35 · answer #3 · answered by Crybaby Conservatives 2 · 4 1

Doctors 43 countries have more physicians per capita than we do!!! Infant Deaths 33 countries have lower rates!!! Male life expectancy residents of 27 other countries live longer!!! The U. S. spends the most on health care!!! BUT ARE WE GETTING OUR MONEY'S worth!!!!! The U. S. health care has steadily declined over the last 20yrs!!!!!

2007-01-31 11:25:52 · answer #4 · answered by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 · 2 1

Interestingly enough, because their universal systems are so much more efficient, countries that spend far less than we do actually buy better health care. That's because the most effective route to good general health is via basic public health measures. Such measures include universal sanitation, universal vaccination for preventable diseases, prenatal and baby care, screening for conditions that can benefit from early treatment, and universal annual checkups, as well as public education on factors that affect health, such as diet, exercise, and lifestyle. Even poorer nations, which spend far less than we do, have better longevity statistics because a universal system naturally invests relatively more in public health.

Britain, despite its threadbare system of medical treatment, covers everyone. So it actually has an average life expectancy (at birth) of about 78 years, compared with 75 years in the United States. Other countries with universal systems that spend 9 or 10 percent of GDP have life expectancies over 80 years.

interestingly enough, because their universal systems are so much more efficient, countries that spend far less than we do actually buy better health care. That's because the most effective route to good general health is via basic public health measures. Such measures include universal sanitation, universal vaccination for preventable diseases, prenatal and baby care, screening for conditions that can benefit from early treatment, and universal annual checkups, as well as public education on factors that affect health, such as diet, exercise, and lifestyle. Even poorer nations, which spend far less than we do, have better longevity statistics because a universal system naturally invests relatively more in public health.

Britain, despite its threadbare system of medical treatment, covers everyone. So it actually has an average life expectancy (at birth) of about 78 years, compared with 75 years in the United States. Other countries with universal systems that spend 9 or 10 percent of GDP have life expectancies over 80 years.

Nearly 48 million Americans will be uninsured for the entire year in 2005. What happens when some of these 48 million Americans get sick? Research has shown that the uninsured often put off getting care for health problems—or forgo care altogether.1 When the symptoms can no longer be ignored, the uninsured do see doctors and go to hospitals. Without insurance to pay the tab, the uninsured struggle to pay as much as they can: More than one-third (35 percent) of the total cost of health care services provided to people without health insurance is paid out-of-pocket by the uninsured themselves.

the remaining $43 billion is primarily paid by two sources: Roughly one-third is reimbursed by a number of government programs, and two-thirds is paid through higher premiums for people with health insurance.

As the costs of care for the uninsured are added to health insurance premiums that are already rising steeply, more employers can be expected to drop coverage, leaving even more people without insurance. And as more people lose coverage and the cost of their care is added to premiums for the insured, still more employers will drop coverage. It's a vicious circle that will not end until we as a nation take steps to solve the underlying problems.

Two republican governors have or will institute UHC state systems-because it will save them money!

2007-01-31 10:27:47 · answer #5 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 4 1

Nice try.
Universal Health Care is the cause of Western Europes' demise.
In twenty years UHC and other programs will cause them to be Third World Nations.
UHC IS A LOSER.
OUR PROBLEM IS SHYSTER LAWYERS, LIKE JOHN EDWARDS, WHO HAS DRIVEN UP THE COSTS OF HEALTH CARE & HEALTH INSURANCE.
Check out what Edwards has done to everyone in this country.

2007-01-31 10:21:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

I think that if there weren't so many people here sucking our economy dry and sending money to people in other countries, then we wouldn't have such a problem

2007-01-31 10:19:53 · answer #7 · answered by lc 5 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers