2007-01-31 09:23:42 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It is NOT the rich who have illegitimate rule & control It is a small % of the elite wealthy. They buy.sell & plant politicians! With the right organized effort & leadership i can see Majority rule by the legal citizens replacing the current role of Representative Government legally by constitutional amendment.The poor have the numbers,the will, & a power that can be used "FIRE" everyone fears the power of "FIRE!" burn the wealthy out!
2007-01-31 09:26:46 · answer #1 · answered by bulabate 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If the poor rose up against the rich, neither would win. The government would immediately step in and attempt to restore domestic tranquility. In a way, i suppose that means the rich would win.
2007-01-31 09:30:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The balance of population is way lob sided on the poor side. The rich need to get kicked in the head for making this country the way it is. The rich should fix the poverty problem in this country before fixing other countries.
2007-01-31 09:38:34 · answer #3 · answered by the duke 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
nicely, there are greater, many greater, damaging. however the weapons are all on the realm of the wealthy (see modern-day discussions correct to the militia commercial complicated.) fairly, for the reason that i'm working-classification damaging, I ought to assert that i think of the wealthy are already in a conflict against us. They use our babies for cannon fodder of their wars. They deliver our jobs to China (that once-dreaded Communist, non-human-rights having united states...). They squeeze us for each drop of money we make. (No "loop-holes" for us).etc. etc. etc. EDIT: guess you would be stunned by skill of this answer from this super Liberal--i think of that they "bribe" us each and every few years by skill of letting us think of we've elected a Democrat! (And that this Dem. is someway distinctive...)
2016-09-28 06:09:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The poor because they "we" would have less to lose and would be hungrier, I hate corporate America and Ive been thinking about this alot lately, good question; O and most rich people are fat and out of shape so I say bring it on!
2007-01-31 09:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by Matt G 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The poor. Due to their sheer numbers. I'm not sure what you're defining as rich, but in my mind they make up less than 1% of the population.
2007-01-31 09:34:21 · answer #6 · answered by PanamaMike 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The poor would win for a very short time and then be poor once again--Social Darwinism
2007-01-31 09:26:59 · answer #7 · answered by SHOOTER586 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think the elite few in this country keep We The People separated by politics. That protects their interests. We are fighting amonst ourselves and therefore are no threat to them. Just think what we could do if we all united.
2007-01-31 09:35:48 · answer #8 · answered by Lou 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
probably the rich becaus ethey have money, which they can use for weapons, ammo etc and easily get rid of all the poor.
2007-01-31 09:28:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
well i think power belongs to those who can afford it. so the rich, having more resources available to them would clearly out run to poor..
2007-01-31 09:34:49 · answer #10 · answered by michael s 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋