Is this another of those failures the Democrats like to talk about or maybe they don't?
2007-01-31 09:15:42 · 25 answers · asked by Border Security!! 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because we are making it easy for the terrorists by sending people (civilians as well as military) to Iraq to be killed.
2007-01-31 09:18:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
I love this question because it always completely ignores the nearly 8 years without an attack under Clinton. If you are going to insists on people giving Bush credit for 5 years you have to be willing to give Clinton credit for nearly 8. If you're going to give Bush credit but not Clinton I would love to hear the rationale.
RESPONSE - If we are going to rationalize and include embassies then Bush's run is over. The embassy in Greece was attacked not long ago. A US military vessel is no more US territory than any of the military vehicles in Iraq that have been bombed. If we're talking about the United States then there were no attacks from February, 1993 until 9/11. Just under 8 of those years were under Clinton.
2007-01-31 09:21:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
We will be attacked again. It has nothing to do with the damn president. That jackass is giving them plenty of men to kill why would they have to come here to do it.
But we are TEACHING the iqac people stuff to make their lives better. Did we learn nothing from 9/11.
We opened our bourders and taught them how to fly, and sold the weapons when his daddy and reagan got caught. We set the stage for 9/11 by our own actions.
President bush Tells what he thinks will make him look good, Of course he said there were 4 attack attemps, trying to justify him sending more troups to serve their death sentences in that god forsaken country.
They say hes leading ourtroups... Bull crap he is sending them over i dont see him up on the front line holding our flag. Nor have we seen any of his kids or grandkids being killed and sent home in a timy box because the rest of them were blown to dust.
2007-01-31 09:31:56 · answer #3 · answered by tammer 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We haven't had any more attacks on American soil simply because the Bush Administrations policies are working but you wont hear Democrats admit that.
2007-01-31 11:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by arikinder 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of Al Aaeda or Taliban what ever they call it. i think of they carried out their objective, to scare individuals. I additionally think of 9/11 took years to plot and for all all of us be attentive to it could have been a interior activity. yet i gotta admit, the U. S. particular beefed up protection, yet while there develop into to be a terrorist attack interior the U. S., i'm particular it would be carried out via the folk we least assume....individuals, nicely usually white individuals or very almost any american. We concentration to lots on muslims questioning their all are terrorists yet we additionally forget approximately there are a number of white american terrorists and with each and all the attention on Muslims they might do their plans greater freely. nicely that's what i think of.
2016-11-01 23:57:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay, you got me there. The only terrorist attack on George's watch was the largest one in our nation's history. He so crippled Al Qaeda that they managed to later attack the UK and Bali, among others. He's responsible for more American deaths in Iraq now than 9/11. And Osama Bin Laden remains at large.
Is that enough talk for you?
2007-01-31 09:20:40 · answer #6 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
except the unsolved anthrax attacks. part of the reason for no other attacks is a "terrorist" that helped the US. another to thank would be the UK. a US embassy is considered American soil
2007-01-31 09:23:16 · answer #7 · answered by J Q Public 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Possibly because 9/11 was not a legitimate terrorist attack in the first place. Possibly because it was an inside job to galvanize support for going to war in Iraq and Afghanistan and to pass the Patriot Act
http://911truth.org/
2007-01-31 09:29:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Don't believe that Bush had anything to do with that. It took years of planning for 9/11 and the next attack will take years more. So far Bush has been lucky that nothing has happened because of the great work of the England cops.
2007-01-31 09:19:53 · answer #9 · answered by CctbOh 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Because the terrorists have attacked Britain, Spain and Indonesia in the interim.
And map, did you forget the first WTC bombing in 1993, or the USS Cole or the Kenyan and Tanzanian embassies? Oh, so sorry, I've just peed on Bill Clinton's snow.
2007-01-31 09:27:30 · answer #10 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why haven't we had any elephant attacks on American soil in the past six years?
It *must* be because of the administration's strict anti-elephant laws.
Then again, how many elephant attacks happened on American soil in the past fifty years? Not that many.
Get it?
2007-01-31 09:26:13 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋