I'll have to go with MJ & The Tempts.... They were better singers, dancers, had more style, had more soul, & Elvis wasn't original anyways. He stole alot of peoples music!
2007-01-31 09:13:15 · 9 answers · asked by Hack-O-Shaq 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Michael would always beat Elvis no matter what group they belonged to!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2007-01-31 11:02:01 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I'd have to go with Elvis and the Beatles. No music is original these days(every time I turn the radio on I hear an old song being covered by a new band.) The Beatles where original and the most important thing of all, not one of those men has been up on child abuse charges, to me that makes all the difference. MJ is a pedophile and I don't care how good he use to be, I refuse to listen to his music. To do so would be to support him and I won't do that. And before anyone tries to protest MJ's innocence think on this, as rich as he is if he was innocent he would've kept fighting the charges in court, he didn't because he knew he would lose. Instead he offered hush money, so much that his victims have been hushed. Those are the actions of a guilty man.
So the King of rock'n'roll is still King and the Beatles are still more popular than Jesus.
2007-01-31 09:38:58 · answer #2 · answered by Curious1 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
MJ and the temptations definately! The beatles are good but Elvis SUCKS. he is not a true musician...got someone else to write music for him.
2007-02-01 13:40:22 · answer #3 · answered by Jennifer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. They would conflict with the styles of the groups. Elvis would be a horrible fit for the beatles and Michael would be equally as bad for the temptations.
2007-01-31 09:22:44 · answer #4 · answered by Trust me 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm of the Presley/Beatles generation. Not listed among the choices, unfortunately, is Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby, Jr., who is actually the king of pop, with 41 number 1 hits, and an astounding 383 ( ! ) in the top 30. At one time in the late 40's, Crosby tunes filled an estimated *half* of the air time devoted to music. But when you ask "Who's bigger in music history?," its fair to include non-performance impact, and Crosby gains points there because of his innovative use of the microphone, his involvement with Ampex, and his pre-recording of radio programs (so he could go out and play golf), all of which altered music history. Just as an aside, Crosby's rendition of "White Christmas" -- during World War II when our men and women were fighting in Europe and the Pacific so that we could be here today discussing such things -- became something of a second national anthem. It made everybody think of those they couldn't be with.
2016-05-23 23:46:12 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elvis and the Beatles by a landslide.... Now Michael Jackson paired with someone better might give them a run for their money.
2007-01-31 09:21:46 · answer #6 · answered by Kamryn's Mommie 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
MJ and the Temps are better. I don't partically like Elvis's style even though he is very cool!!!
2007-01-31 09:20:53 · answer #7 · answered by Fat guy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
HEY KING OF THE WORLD, WHAT MUSIC DID ELVIS STEAL????HE WASN'T A SONGWRITER -JUST A SINGER
AND I WOULD PUT HIM WITH THE TEMPTS................THEY
HAD THE SAME EAR FOR MUSIC
2007-01-31 09:22:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i disagree, i think elvis( after he kicked john's butt for being a weenie) and the beatles, would rock.
2007-01-31 09:22:09 · answer #9 · answered by geezer 51 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋