i dont really believe in horoscopes but i'm a gemini could any one say why its the sign ov the twins?

Answer 1

I'm a gemini and I never thought as to why, just thought whoever decided to create a horoscope decided it that way, But I think it has to do with personality. They say people who are geminis have two different people in them. Like me, I'm all nice and Miss goody but actually, Yes, I'm nice vut not a really good girl. See, I have two opposite personalities. Just don't tell my parents. LOL

Answer 2

Well being a Gemini myself I can answer that question. A Gemini has like 2 personalities thats why its the 2 twins. For example i am fun, loving, and great to be around 98% of the time. Then theres that other 2% that is totally diff and can be mean, irrate, and horrible. Most Geminis are like that. We can totally switch from one to the other in a quick second. Does that make some sense to you?

Answer 3

ok have you ever noticed that the devil is a gemini 6 month, 6 day, 6 hour.
now the devil has two sides to him, the appealing side that faulsly gives you confidence, and the destrudtive side who plays you for a fool.
now much like geminis, you are very cunning and smooth.(at the same time)
you know how to make people feel wanted then later telling them to get lost.
you can easily slither your way out of a problem, even if it concerning you, you can just leave and no one will be the wiser.
you can constantly swich you moods like its nothing, and one day like one person, then hate them the next, even on the same day.
you use your verbal skills to your full advantage, you can talk your way out of anything, and you also can get anything you wanted, you dont need to try much.
communication stimulation is what gets you geminis off.
the twins allow you use your hands and speech while the other puts it in drive.
as the third sign of the zodiac, your motto is of the truth is in 3's.
as in third parties. the twins play as two people.'' yours, mine and theres............. get it?
the gemini is associated with the devil, thats the month, time and day, the angel lusifer was sent to rule the underworld, by popousely disobaying god.
has you ever heard a tiny voice in you head, and its your voice, thats your twin, is then you switch side, and you just start to confuse people off the hop. thats why i nicknamed them all
Gemini Freaks
lol

i dont know if this makes sence to you but its all the truth, im in astrology classes and i have books and internet info.
the horoscopes play a huge part of your personality and attitudes
but you dont have to belive it thats totally up to you hun
ok

good luck.

Answer 4

Two of the stars that make the heads are Castor & Pollux.They were twin brothers in Greek myth. At this time of year it is near Orion.

As to the responder above, if astrology is true what is the evidence? Astrology can and has been tested. It fails.

Those who paid attention in school may remember the scientific method.

The scientific method is the best way yet discovered for winnowing the truth from lies and delusion. The simple version looks something like this:

1. Observe some aspect of the universe.
2. Invent a tentative description, called a hypothesis, that is consistent with what you have observed.
3. Use the hypothesis to make predictions.
4. Test those predictions by experiments or further observations and modify the hypothesis in the light of your results.
5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 until there are no discrepancies between theory and experiment and/or observation.

When consistency is obtained the hypothesis becomes a theory and provides a coherent set of propositions which explain a class of phenomena. A theory is then a framework within which observations are explained and predictions are made.

Astrology use science but is not science. Consistency is crucial for science while in astrology there is none. In all tests astrology fails. Possibly the most detailed test of astrology using this type of method, was performed by Shawn Carlson. His paper, “A Double-blind Test of Astrology”, was published in the prestigious peer reviewed scientific journal Nature, in 1985. The interesting thing is that the San Francisco chapter of the National Council for Geocosmic Research recommended the 28 professional astrologers who took part, and (with Carlson), designed the tests. They also predicted, in advance, what they would consider to be a successful test.

Two tests were performed:

Test #1: Astrological charts were prepared for 83 subjects, based on natal data (date, time and place of birth), provided by the subjects. Each subject was given three charts: one chart based on their own natal data, and two charts derived from natal data of other people. Each subject was asked to identify the chart that most correctly described them. In only 28 of the 83 cases, the subject chose their own chart. This is the exact success rate expected for random chance. The astrologers predicted that the subjects would select their own chart more that 50% of the time.

Test #2: 116 subjects completed California Personality Index surveys and provided natal data (date, time and place of birth). One set of natal data and the results of three personality surveys (one of which was for the same person as the natal data) were given to an astrologer who was to interpret the natal data and determine which of the three CPI results belonged to the same subject as the natal data. In only 40 of the 116 cases, the astrologers chose the correct CPI. As with test #1, this is the exact success rate expected for random chance. The astrologers predicted that they would select the correct CPI profiles in more that 50 per cent of the trials.

Conclusion by Carlson:

"We are now in a position to argue a surprisingly strong case against natal astrology as practiced by reputable astrologers. Great pains were taken to insure that the experiment was unbiased and to make sure that astrology was given every reasonable chance to succeed. It failed. Despite the fact that we worked with some of the best astrologers in the country, recommended by the advising astrologers for their expertise in astrology and in their ability to use the CPI, despite the fact that every reasonable suggestion made by advising astrologers was worked into the experiment, despite the fact that the astrologers approved the design and predicted 50% as the "minimum" effect they would expect to see, astrology failed to perform at a level better than chance.

"I have not yet received a serious scientific challenge to the paper. The newsletter of the American Federation of Astrologers Network published a response in January (1986). I was very disappointed to see that it largely consists of personal attacks. Its few substantive criticisms are attributable to ignorance of the experiment, of the CPI, and of basic scientific methodology."

So the astrologers failed their own test. Does this mean they gave up astrology as being useless? Of course not: they are totally closed minded to the possibility that astrology doesn’t work.

Answer 5

Im a gemini too my birthdays june 8 (sorry im not sure why its twins - it said that geminis have a split personality/2sides, and perhaps the twins represent the splitting of 2 or something)

Answer 6

We are all like this...good and bad...there is nothing true in horoscopes...we have to think and be good people!
Take care of yourself ther are a lot of lies around you, pray if you want to live as a real human being!

Answer 7

I don't know, but i'm a Gemini too, my birthday is June 7th.

Answer 8

Dual personalities!! LoL, at LEAST 2!