Which do you prefer???????? Both offered me a SWEET deal. I am with Direct now and want to stay, but Direct wants to charge me a 300 deposit to upgrade to HDTV...worth it?????????
2007-01-31 07:19:29 · 6 answers · asked by hunter_bug_4me 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
Time Warner!!
The bundle package is really a good deal. Cable, Road Runner, and Digital phone service for as little as $99.
And no, I don't work for TWC.....
But my husband does, so it's free for us.
But even if it weren't, we'd still have it. All my family and friends do, and they don't get it at a discounted price. So, yeah, TWC hands down!!!
2007-01-31 08:00:49 · answer #1 · answered by ♥LadyC♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time Warner of course. everyone i know says when theres bad weather the satellite goes out. the only way cable is going out only if u loose power. u pay a little more than satellite but who wants no TV during a storm when your inside because of the bad weather. I like the On Demand features especially the movie channels. u can watch the movie anytime u want.
2007-01-31 16:06:05 · answer #2 · answered by ☺#1 Packers Fan☺ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if I would pay that much to upgrade. I have had both and am currently a Time Warner member, which I like because bad weather (when you are typically inside) does not screw up your reception. Directv is often cheaper in its monthly charges, though. Investigate both of them!
2007-01-31 15:25:39 · answer #3 · answered by t_rav 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The on demand stuff is kind of cool with Time Warner.
2007-01-31 15:26:47 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm on TW(Comcast now), I love it. Everyone I know has problems with their satellite systems.
2007-01-31 15:24:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
TIME WARNER OF COURSE!!!!
2007-01-31 15:26:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋