English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

His approval rating has dropped lower than any other president ever. He admitted he was wrong sending troops into Iraq and then minutes later announced that he would send 20,000 soldiers over. 9/11 was supposed to be the greatest attack ever on America but he spent, um let see, about a month looking for Osama before distracting the public with the WMD's in Iraq, which we never found because they didn't have any to begin with. Although it will never be proved he probably cheated in both elections to make it into office. I could list quite a few more things I hate about the guy but I'm running out of characters. Bottom line, Bush is a modern day Hitler. If you don't believe me, look up the definition of facism and tell me that doesn't sound exactly like Bush. Let's get him out before he starts WWIII.

2007-01-31 06:54:05 · 15 answers · asked by lazyjbob 5 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Encourage Congress to investigate. The Democratic Congress should pursue Bush and Cheney relentlessly and build an incontrovertible case for impeachment.

If the truth comes out, even the Republicans will admit Bush and Cheney are criminals, and they will both be forced to resign, together.

2007-01-31 07:04:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 10

You can't get impeached for low approval ratings. Bush never said he wrong for sending troops in Iraq. That's a complete fallacy that Saddam never had WMDs. First off, we gave him WMDs in the 1980's. Secondly he used the WMDs on his own people. So your comment on that he never had them is entirely false. Bush won the electoral college in both elections which means you win the presidency, it's how we've always elected presidents. Bush is by no means a modern day Hitler. You don't know the first thing about Hitler or Nazism. If you're such and expert in fascism I would hope you could spell the word correctly before you start calling people fascists. Here's the definition for fascism

Main Entry: fas·cism
Pronunciation: 'fa-"shi-z&m also 'fa-"si-
Function: noun
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
- fas·cist /-shist also -sist/ noun or adjective, often capitalized
- fas·cis·tic /fa-'shis-tik also -'sis-/ adjective, often capitalized
- fas·cis·ti·cal·ly /-ti-k(&-)lE/ adverb, often capitalized

2007-01-31 15:38:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Let's start.

1 - An approval rating being low is not a valid reason for impeachment.

2 - Admission of a mistake is by no means admission of violation of a law. He's not broken any laws. He invaded Iraq with Congress' approval.

3 - Comparisons to Hitler are so far off, you really need to read up on Hitler. Bush, in no way, shape or form, has EVER sought the elimination of groups of people based on ethnicity.

Hate him so much? Vote in 2008. He's out anyway

2007-01-31 15:06:45 · answer #3 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 8 1

I agree with you. There is only one thing i like about Bush....He's a DUMMY!!!! he cant even pronounce bigger words unless his mommy helps him.
He won't be able to start WWIII because he doesn't have support from any other countries, I mean france is not going to join in, and Japan isn't either.
To get him impeached we have to do something dramadic, like set up a scandle for him fall into, or maybe even protest in front of the White House, holding signs saying to impeached.
I do think that he cheated the first election, because his brother is governer of Florida, but i believe he won the second on his own, because many people don't like to change presidents in the middle of a war. But i do got to say that If it were Edwards / Kerry, instead of Kerry / Edwards then we would have a different prez, because the south really wanted Edwards in office. I know i would have voted Edwards over Kerry, but i was not 18 at the time, but turned 18 in time to vote Kerry over Bush, but i guess Bush still won, so i figured the best thing to do is to move on and wait for the next four years for another prez. can't wait until the next election in '08!

2007-01-31 15:20:34 · answer #4 · answered by milky 4 · 1 2

you need to start picking up beer cans or something else productive because IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN
As a matter of fact your Speaker of the House was on the intelligence committee 8 years
“I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. … Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons.”

Nancy Pelosi
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002

2007-01-31 15:13:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Sorry your wrong - Iraq DID have WMD to begin with. Saddam used chemical bombs on the town of Hallabjah in 1988 / 1989. Killing 5,000 Men Women and Children. It was part of his ethnic cleansing campaign known as the Anfal campaign.

It is ok to be against Bush or this war, but get your facts straight, and you'll have more credibility

2007-01-31 15:06:40 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 6 1

Approval ratings are not grounds for impeachment. Being wrong is not grounds for impeachment. Attacking Iraq is not grounds for impeachment. You probably won't prove that he cheated in the elections, it happens all the time, and an accusation is not grounds for impeachment.

Bush is not a modern day Hitler, read a history book and then tell me that. To get impeached, you need to commit a crime. Bush has not committed any crime, you can't just impeach someone because you don't like them or disagree with them.

2007-01-31 15:05:23 · answer #7 · answered by Pfo 7 · 10 2

Good god man are you nuts? Impeach Bush and make Cheney President? Thats crazy.

2007-01-31 15:05:33 · answer #8 · answered by David W 3 · 2 2

You should be so pleased with your essay here that makes all you democrats shine as great name callers. Hurray! back up every charge you have made with facts or you will be reported for slander.

2007-01-31 15:09:48 · answer #9 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 4 2

What? Bush is Hilter?

Man, have you got your facts wrong.

2007-01-31 15:08:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

He has not committed any impeachable offenses. . Its called power. When your guy wins an election, he'll do similar things that the other side thinks are impeachable offenses. Get over it.

2007-01-31 15:03:50 · answer #11 · answered by Fred C. Dobbs 4 · 9 4

fedest.com, questions and answers