English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would you vote for Hillary? Why or why not?

2007-01-31 06:38:24 · 86 answers · asked by kaiticometrue 3 in Politics & Government Politics

86 answers

Hillary is a fence-rider who can't decide if she was for the war before she was against it. Thinking that she can re-write history regarding her vote for the war in Iraq is not only cowardly and dishonest but it is insulting to all of us who actually remember what she told us when she voted for the war in Iraq in 2003.

Hillary entered the White House in 1993 as the so-called, "co-president". Remember all of the media hype about America getting "two for the price of one"? The unelected co-president promptly took charge of the commission to reform health care which was an utter disaster! The secretive and deceptive manner in which she attempted to push through what amounted to a complete government take over of the entire health care system (and rejected by even the main stream Democrat Party) was so appalling that even the minority Democrats were relieved that she was relegated for the remainder of Clinton's term to do charity work.

During her entire time as a Senator from New York she has done nothing but take credit for an economic boom that was brought about by the tax reduction strategy of the Bush administration.

Hillary and Bill Clinton have had nothing but financial scandals for which half of their former "friends" and employers have become convicted felons (or have had mysterious deaths). The most blatant example was Bill's presidential pardon of a convicted cocaine dealer whose family had just made a large campaign contribution to Hillary.

I would vote to put Hillary in jail where she belongs with the rest of her friends.

2007-01-31 08:21:51 · answer #1 · answered by laohutaile 3 · 3 1

Definitely not! Hillary is a pimple on the face of life. I believe that she and her husband are dishonest, pretentious, and self-serving. We don't need a third Clinton term....Hillary already had her 8 years in the White House. I can say this with sincerity...I would love to see a woman president as I am a female myself. However; I would not vote for this woman....it would have to be a smart candidate that actually cares about the issues and that hasn't gained financially from actions that our government has taken.

2007-01-31 06:45:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

relieved that she was relegated for the remainder of Clinton's term to do charity work.

During her entire time as a Senator from New York she has done nothing but take credit for an economic boom that was brought about by the tax reduction strategy of the Bush administration.

Hillary and Bill Clinton have had nothing but financial scandals for which half of their former "friends" and employers have become convicted felons (or have had mysterious deaths). The most blatant example was Bill's presidential pardon of a convicted cocain

2014-11-02 16:25:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hillary entered the White House in 1993 as the so-called, "co-president". Remember all of the media hype about America getting "two for the price of one"? The unelected co-president promptly took charge of the commission to reform health care which was an utter disaster! The secretive and deceptive manner in which she attempted to push through what amounted to a complete government take over of the entire health care system (and rejected by even the main stream Democrat Party) was so appalling that even the minority Democrats were relieved that she was relegated for the remainder of Clinton's term to do charity work.

2016-02-10 04:01:26 · answer #4 · answered by Nabhij 3 · 0 0

The whole female president doesn't matter to me, other countries have had female leaders long before us and it's no different than a male president. It's all about the credentials, experience and ability to get the job that the majority of Americans want done...Can Hilary be this President? I'm not sure at this point. I'll need to research more and see her in more speeches and debates before I will decide if she is fit to be the next President of the United States.

2007-01-31 06:48:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

N O!!! Too much excess baggage from the time
Slick Willie Clinton was Governor of Arkansas and his presidency and their involvement with
White Water and the Rose Law Firm, her handling of the government travel department
and many other things connected to crooked dealings!! Do a Yahoo Search on the Clintons.

2007-01-31 06:47:21 · answer #6 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 4 0

NO!!! She should have been sent to prison 25 years ago with Bill. Vincent Foster s murder was just one reason back then. Drug running in Arkansas, plus murders there to cover it up for Bill. The Clinton Chronicles are on Youtube for all to see, and should be broadcast on prime time TV NOW, but I know the mainstream media is bought and paid for and that will never happen.

2016-03-08 08:41:02 · answer #7 · answered by Doug 1 · 1 0

I always made jokes about how she wore the pants in the family when Bill was President. But to be honest, I really liked a lot of what Bill Clinton did as President and I'm inclined to think Hillary has a lot of the same values. I don't know yet whether I would vote for her because it would depend on what her issues are and who she's running against, but I don't have any specific reason why I would vote against her.

Although I tend to be on the liberal (Democrat) side of the spectrum, I could see myself voting for someone like John McCain depending on what his platform is. McCain has shown himself to be a stand-up person and he has also shown he doesn't stick strictly to party lines.

2008 is going to be an interesting campaign, and probably one of the most vicious in history. There are a lot of people who have bad feelings toward Republicans after the last 6 years under Bush and his rubber stamp Congress. However, it's not a done deal from the Democrats. They need to come out with a strong candidate and a united front or they could still be vulnerable to a someone like John McCain.

And for what it's worth, I think McCain is the only Republican at this point who has a legitimate chance of winning in 2008. He is a known name an he already has support among some Democrats. Rudy Giuliani has some name recognition and street credibility after the way he dealt with 9/11 as mayor of NYC, but he's been out of the political spotlight for almost 5 years and we don't really know much about him and his policies prior to 9/11.

2007-01-31 06:51:11 · answer #8 · answered by Justin H 7 · 0 4

Nope not a chance. It's funny that she voted for the war when it was popular. then she changes her mind when it became unpopular. Now she's saying if she would have known it was gonna turn out this way, she wouldn't have voted for it. She said she was misguided. Isn't that the political term for not being able to think for herself? I'd like to think so. I think she is fine where she's at in the Senate because she likes to debate. I just have my concerns that she would be able to make decisions by herself for the best overall interest of this nation, much less, make the right decisions without debating on them. I seriously hope people look past all the hype when it comes down to it and realize we need a real leader. Preferrably Mc Cain or Guiliani.

2007-01-31 06:52:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Hell NO!! I don't want Clinton trash again. I wish Bush could run again!! He would have my vote!! He is a strong will person, who is willing to stand up for his country unlike Hilary. She is a weak person with no morals, values and wants everything hand fed to her. Your supose to work for what you want in life. Not be a free loader!! Thats why all you people in here want her as a President. Because she is a free loader and so are you guys!!

2007-01-31 07:00:59 · answer #10 · answered by Alice G 1 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers