every day we play the game of life and we do it well. do we play chess or do we play poker. basically I talking about how we solve problems. some people are calculative {chess} and some people bluff there way through life {poker}.
which is the way you solve problems and why.
here some examples of how each work.
poker solution: when someone his holding something good against you. you instaly solution and bluff an say you have something better or try to by them off.
chess solution to that problem: you think for hours as you come up with a way to solve the problem. eventually putting the other person in check mate.
I kind of both
p.s. you can go with another game for your answer if you' like.
2007-01-31 05:48:09 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Man Sweet Question, I will have to say that my entire life has been about POKER until this day, I am always taking chances waiting for a BLUFF.
2007-01-31 07:01:14 · answer #1 · answered by josh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would tend to be the chess person.
I don't think the poker analogy would apply to many people. I think the opposite to the chess person is someone who simply lives life moment to moment based on what's happening now rather than thinking several moves ahead. To use your poker analogy, it would be someone who lives life one hand at a time.
2007-01-31 13:54:27 · answer #2 · answered by Justin H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I play "Games People Play" of which a science has been developed to understand better what and how that game is. It is called transactional analysis.
2007-01-31 14:17:31 · answer #3 · answered by JORGE N 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't play games with people like that|
I try to do what I can to help them|
---
2007-01-31 14:51:14 · answer #4 · answered by Catholic Philosopher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋