Can you tell me what IVF stands for in this question? I've seen it mean several things. Thanks...Lew
2007-01-31 05:35:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lew 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
You shouldn't pay for IVF as this precludes those people who cannot afford it from trying. People should be allowed to have three attempts and then, if still unsuccessful, further treatments should be paid for.
In the UK we contribute enough through taxes to justify putting people through IVF without charging.
These are the views of my partner who is a social worker. The other point that she made was that its often the case that the NHS doesn't carry out the right medical tests when trying to establish whether a person should attempt IVF in the first place.
We have friends who went private and had a series of tests that highlighted the problems and avoided going down the IVF route.
Hope that helps although this is an opinion rather than cold hard facts.
2007-01-31 05:41:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steve D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
IVF is a very expensive procedure and risky as well. It doesn't have a very high success rate, so the expense involved doesn't even always pay off. If it were to be free, then the level of care would dramatically decline. It would decline because no doctor would want to practice within IVF because they wouldn't make any money (and most Docs come out of medical school/residency with $100K+ in student loans, how are they going to pay those loans if they don't get paid for doing IVF?). If the best docs decided NOT to do IVF because there is no money to make then only the lame docs would do IVF and the failure rate would increase and make it a less viable reason to even attempt IVF. Medical procedures are expensive because of the cost to perform them as well as the cost to doctors to pay for medical malpractice for all the waccos who sue because things don't turn out exactly the way they want them to.
2007-01-31 05:40:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Susan B 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
you may want to not pay for IVF as this precludes those those who can not have the money for it from attempting. human beings might want to be allowed to have 3 tries and then, if though unsuccessful, more effective treatments might want to be paid for. interior the united kingdom we make a contribution sufficient by taxes to justify putting human beings by IVF without charging. those are the perspectives of my better half who's a social worker. the various element that she made replaced into that its typically the case that the NHS does no longer carry out the right clinical tests even as attempting to make certain no count number if a guy or lady might want to opt to attempt IVF interior the first position. we've friends who went inner maximum and had more than a number of tests that highlighted the topics and prevented taking position the IVF course. choose that facilitates in spite of no matter if it really is an opinion quite than chilly troublesome information.
2016-10-17 04:22:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I understand Steve D point about paying for IVF. However it is a very expensive tratment. 3 attempts costs a lot of money and somebody has to pay. If insurance companies or government takes the bill, they will pass on the burden to the rest of the population. I'd rather lobby for coverage for people who have no access whatsoever to health care or for less restrictions in life saving procedures such as organ transplants and stuff, rather than advocate for IVF.
2007-01-31 06:25:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by dahfna 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm presuming you mean in vitro fertilization. Your question is vague when you say why should WE pay for IVF. Who is supposed to pay for it other than the person who wants it done? Who is supposed to pay the doctors, technicians, office workers who will all be involved? IF YOU WANT SOMETHING YOU NEED TO PAY FOR IT. NOTHING IS FREE AND IF YOU DO NOT PAY THEN SOMEONE ELSE IS PAYING!!! Your question cracks me up.
2007-01-31 05:39:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
dont get me wrong there are people out there who have tried for years and years to have ivf for kids and it has cost them thousands i think there should be some kind of free treatment for the serious ones
2007-01-31 06:43:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by justhell75 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay, here's a thought for you. Why SHOULDN'T you pay for IVF? If you don't, someone has to. Should the taxpayers fund it? Why should my tax dollars fund your getting pregnant?
Or do you expect doctors, nurses, lab techs, etc. to work for free?
Just some thoughts...
2007-01-31 05:35:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
More to the point, Why should WE pay for IVF.
2007-01-31 12:11:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. It's expensive.
2. Not having it is not life threatening.
3. It follows from the above two statements that, (in stark monetary terms), the money is better used elsewhere.
2007-01-31 05:50:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by efes_haze 5
·
0⤊
0⤋