English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Looking at two different perspectives, Positivist and Constructionist perspective?
What different fetishes would fit under the two categories and why do you think that?

2007-01-31 05:19:55 · 1 answers · asked by JP123 1 in Social Science Psychology

1 answers

POSITIVISM IS LINGUISTIC IN NATURE,

WHEREAS CONSTRUCTIVISM IS A

PRACTICABILITY!

One who go on bragging about the "positivism", simply talks, and go on talking from his accumulated knowledge, borrowed from others!!

He might have got it from, self-analysis, self-developmental books, or through the talks of others!
He, will analyse more and more,
sitting and thinking for eternity
about the pros & cons of every activities
and its benefits going to come for him!!

UNLIKE HIM,

THE CONSTRUCTIONIST IS

A DYNAMIC WORKER

AND HIS LANGUAGE IS NOTHING BUT

"HARD WORK"!

He thinks less, but act more immediately!

He used to drive his vehicle on the road, and whenever the hurdles confronts him, he manages accordingly through his 'presence of mind', without any Books at hand for reference!!

HIS WAYS ARE SIMPLE,
HE MOVES LEFT WHEN HE FINDS ANY PROBLEMS AT RIGHT, AND VISE VERSA!!
AND HE MOVES ON AND ON FOR EVER!!

He never carry any advice on his head, he flows naturally and see to the result LIKE A RIVER!

HE STARTS FIRST, AND ASK OTHERS NEXT FOR ANY HELP IF NEEDED, UNLIKE THE POSITIVIST (analysing toms) WHO DOES NEVER-ENDING ANALYSIS!!

And from my PERSPECTIVE,
the Constructionist are always the winner
than the positivists!
At the most, the Positivists can be
a Book-writer and Free-advicer
to the innocent "little minds" and
never for the Great Dynamic People &
Inborn Geniuses!!

BUT, BOTH ( Positivists & Constructionists) ARE NEEDED FOR THIS WORLD TO RUN THE SHOW!

YES, THE PASSIVE RAIL-WAY

AND

THE DYNAMIC ENGINE ON IT!!

2007-01-31 06:36:48 · answer #1 · answered by yozenbalki 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers