2007-01-31 03:19:59 · 11 answers · asked by blitz 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
Di Canio was the better talent. Ginola wouldn't run back if his mom was on fire!
2007-01-31 03:24:19 · answer #1 · answered by Robb the B.D.C. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Di Canio was better,
Ginola was average with a few spells of top level class.
Di Canio was consistantly a good striker (good enough to have the top clubs sniffing around him even when he was into his thirties)
2007-01-31 03:25:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ginola was a very good dribbler...no doubt that Di Canio is good..its just i fell Ginola is a better player as he has better self-control....
2007-01-31 04:59:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it has to be di canio. both players were capable of momments of inspirational genius but di canio was also a grafter & a fighter, ginola played for maybe 10 or 20 mins a game. so overall it has to be di canio. no contention....
2007-01-31 04:21:11 · answer #4 · answered by aldondub 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Di Canio.
2007-02-03 09:05:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Di Canio obviously!!!
Didn't Ginola like do a loreal hair ad???? how gay is that??
2007-01-31 03:34:11 · answer #6 · answered by Sarah I 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being a West Ham fan I will have to go with Paulo di Canio everytime, the bloke is legendary, I think Barthez is still waiting for that taxi, if your a football fan you will not what i mean
2007-01-31 05:24:07 · answer #7 · answered by simon y 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ginola. He was electric to watch, crap at tracking back, but other players were there to do that for him! Plus he never got silly bans for red cards and pushing over officials....
2007-01-31 03:28:58 · answer #8 · answered by ShelfSideSpur 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Di Canio, no doubt, football genius, I hate to admit. I hate him, that fascist pr**k!
2007-01-31 04:02:51 · answer #9 · answered by alphacharlie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ginola!! biast
2007-01-31 03:30:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋