someone like Hilary in office will have what it takes to manage something of this magnitude while babysitting Bill & keeping track of his antics at the same time? That's a full time job in itself!
2007-01-31 03:05:44 · 10 answers · asked by COblonde 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
dark angel, I had no idea they were running for pres.?? Right back atcha!
2007-01-31 03:13:32 · update #1
Bert, for someone who seems so sure of himself & what he's venting about, you sure have your head in the sand on the day's headlines. Being the congenial & level headed, intelligent conservative that I am though, I will take you by the hand & help you out!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070131/ap_on_re_eu/britain_terror_arrests
2007-01-31 03:26:39 · update #2
Let's see, the war on terror is being fought by more than just the US military & 9/11 killed more than just US citizens.
2007-01-31 03:41:36 · update #3
Whoever runs against Hilary should make an ad that combines the famous Goldwater ad with the end of the 4th hour of this year's "24"...
...because if Hilary is elected, we will have to change to the lyrics of the National Anthem to:
"...by the mushroom cloud's yellow glare/the EMP bursting in air..."
2007-01-31 03:10:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Which terror plot was that? Unfortunately, not even Neo Cons can just SAY a plot has been foiled and assume one actually existed, that didn't work when Bush said Saddam had nukes in Iraq and it certainly isn't going to work now. Show me the link to what you're talking about, or I have to regard this "question" as another thinly disguised attempt to make the Republican party look responsive to terrorism, even though none of Bush's cabinet (or Bush himself) ever served in the real, active Military or have the faintest idea what they're doing in the Middle East.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/usiraqeconomyreconstruction;_ylt=AroXSwL5Y2vLMq1l3NLULvMDW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTBhcmljNmVhBHNlYwNtcm5ld3M-
And why do you say the plot was "ruined"? Are you disappointed? Gee, you think Bush and Klan would let one these plots actually HAPPEN, so he can then turn to the American People and say, "SEE? I TOLD you I knmew what I was talking about"- If you were as loyal to Bush as you Neo Cons say you are, you'd send some Anthrax or something through the mail, or maybe some Sarin into the subways. When are you going to fly another airplane into a building for your President? You call yourself a Patriot, dont you?
2007-01-31 03:19:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
You are obviously insecure to think and feel that babysitting a grown man would occupy any of Hillary's time .Those two people feed off one another's lust for power and control . They may at one time have been attracted to each other but that ended many moons ago and was replaced by an un-ending hunger for power and control .
Hillary would not make a good president ,not for the reasons you mentioned but rather an in ability to see past her own greed for the good of this nation .
2007-01-31 03:15:06 · answer #3 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sweetie, you have ignored the factor completely, yet you're no longer the only one. As for Bush and the dep. of fatherland protection, they might desire to be greater careful. 911 grew to become into the worst terrorist plot in a protracted time, and it grew to become into below their watch; so, confident, Bush owes the american human beings the greater effective precaution and protection. As for the conflict, the priority is this so-stated as conflict on terror has been in step with lies. Lie #a million: Suddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction---this grew to become into never shown. Lie #2: The meant conflict on terror grew to become into inititated to deliver Bin weighted all the way down to justice. he remains alive and loose. confident, that's a physically powerful ingredient for Iraq to alter right into a democracy, yet do you extremely think of our usa/troops could could combat that conflict for them? i do no longer. different countries might desire to agree; they do no longer seem to be taking any responsiblity for Iraq, the two. no person is against a conflict against terrorists, yet i've got no longer considered the place Bin weighted down has been captured. on the grounds which you're so supportive, have you ever enlisted?
2016-11-23 17:25:14 · answer #4 · answered by vanwagoner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No cigars and no interns allowed in the White House if she's elected. Simple soultion is to turn Billie boy into the 1st Eunich.
2007-01-31 03:11:23 · answer #5 · answered by Mousetrappers5 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As much as I despise Hillary and her feminazi movement, she is a vast improvement over the incompetent and foolhardy bush.
2007-01-31 03:21:17 · answer #6 · answered by Monkey Boy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Would you prefer pedophile protector Haggert in that occupation, or the pedophile himself, Foley? Or what about Mr. "American Dream" Rush Limbaugh? Seriously, try a question based on actual purpose, not childish semantics.
2007-01-31 03:10:06 · answer #7 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I got news for you: the UK is not a US state.
Have a good day.
2007-01-31 03:33:08 · answer #8 · answered by tlakkamond 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
You really said it all!!
2007-01-31 03:09:51 · answer #9 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you have nothing to fear, she can handle it a lot better than the current president can.
2007-01-31 03:09:12 · answer #10 · answered by pip 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋