English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Thanks to Emperor Bush and the Jihadist Nazis (Republicans)
Democrats will win all major elections next year and give this country back to the american people

2007-01-31 03:02:55 · 9 answers · asked by Geco H 1 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

Probably not. That's a crybaby Liberal tactic. As is claiming that only THEY represent the American People, and using infantile name calling against sitting Presidents and legitimate Parties.

2007-01-31 03:09:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Oh!!!!! You are an oracle? How do you know the outcome of the 2008 elections? What are the winning power ball numbers? Gimme!

First, this question is based on an unprovable assumption so is unanswerable until after the elections. Are you asking will they if...? If you go back through the past elections, when has the results of a presedential election been challenged? Well, there were mutterings in 2004 and a full blown court case in 2000. The Democrats wanted to retroactively change the voting legislation in Florida to get Gore in. Whether the voting system was right or wrong is immaterial at that time. If it was wrong it should have been challenged before the election. No doubt, it would have been acceptable to the Democrats if they had won. And even then, after so many recounts Bush still won but Gore wanted to keep on recounting until he won and then stop. This was a bit more than crying foul, it was a display of pathetic whining.

The most interesting contested presidential election was 1960. Then, it came down to Illinois to decide whether Kennedy or Nixon won. Nixon was well ahead. Then, Chicago mayor Daley just happened to find a barn full of votes which all just happened to be for Kennedy giving him the state and the Whitehouse. Nixon, when told he should contest the result, refused (yes we are talking about Tricky Dicky) because taking the result of a presedential election to the courts would be harmful to the country. So, the much despised Nixon had more concern for the country than Gore did. As Nixon was such a crook, what does this say for Gore and the Democrats?

2007-01-31 03:29:17 · answer #2 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 2 0

Does a person who refers to the President as "Emperor" and Republicans as "Nazis" have any credibility in smearing others for "crying foul"?

Nevermind the fact that it was Dems who have been crying since the 2000 election.

2007-01-31 03:20:58 · answer #3 · answered by C = JD 5 · 2 0

nicely, that is in basic terms partly real. For one element, that is summer season, and college is out, so, while the kiddies flow decrease back to college...we will lose alot of the republicans here. Secondly, they basically administration the hours, for the period of sport breaks, of their psychological hospitals, and basically until now their 8 pm bedtimes. The adults then generally have the later hours to themselves, to communicate like adults, with out each and all the whacked out childrens. yet particular,,,,,,,for the period of height play hours for them, that could be a vertitable GOP convention in here. I shop waiting for the balloons to drop from the ceiling.

2016-11-01 23:17:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

IF that were to happen,we'd just accept the facts and get down to work-unlike you democrat/liberal crybabies whining about "stolen elections"!!!
being a Republican means I am not "American"???
go f#ck yourself!!!

2007-01-31 03:20:02 · answer #5 · answered by slabsidebass 5 · 2 0

The major difference between Liberals, Democrats and Republicans is that when we CONS lost, we dont whine, biiiitch, blame the diebold machines. we certainly dont hate America when we lost 2006.

and I think we should get rid of DIEBOLD machines because they only worked perfect when Democrats won. why is that????

2007-01-31 03:07:59 · answer #6 · answered by Quickie 3 · 4 1

Only if the Dem's steal it like they stole '06... with the blood of US soldiers and Iraqi citizens!

2007-01-31 03:05:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

at least they can still say they have the Supreme Court right?

2007-01-31 03:10:11 · answer #8 · answered by pip 7 · 1 2

no i doubt it

2007-02-03 04:51:25 · answer #9 · answered by jerry 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers