And that they have been deemed to be irrelevant by the American voters? To listen to them talk you would think they still controlled the house and senate.
2007-01-31 03:00:09 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Just because they lost control of Congress, that doesn't mean they lost their ability to be delusional.
2007-01-31 03:06:55 · answer #1 · answered by Its Hero Dictatorship 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
When will you realize the reason nothing changes is ignorant people think there is a diff between the rep and the Dem's they are all parasites getting fat off the work of Americans they don't care about our best interest and i defy you to make some brainwashed reply as ill give you a hundred examples of how neither side is any better we need a Revolution not a Hillary or Giuliani or however you spell is f u k name
2007-01-31 03:06:54 · answer #2 · answered by fukawthoridy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
so which you help a Fascist government? I advise, that's what you assert to Clubmama, telling her that the Republican occasion won't exist in 10 years and Obama will easily win re-election. Fascist governments run on a one occasion gadget. that's the country, and advocates for a totalitarian, tyranny of maximum folk type government could get the hell out of right here and stay someplace that already caters to that style of gadget. genuine individuals, be they Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, etc., are not going to stand for that bs. i understand supporters of all those events who admire one yet another's comments and artwork together to maintain this usa the way the forefathers meant it. in case you won't have the ability to comprehend that, then you quite might desire to bypass away.
2016-11-23 17:25:01 · answer #3 · answered by vanwagoner 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Bush has veto power used only once during the time the Republicans controlled congress with run way spending bills that Bush never had the never to veto. Plus can Bush spell V E T O?
2007-01-31 04:15:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We have always been the smaller party and yes now that you mention it we are the choice of more and more monorities. 51% is control as you pointed out but consider this. it is the smallest percentage Dems have ever had when they contolled congress. you are rotting away and if the war had not turned unpopular you would not have had that much.............
2007-01-31 03:07:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
"Irrelevant"? That's news to me. Dems were not "irrelevant" in the last 12 years, were they?
Nice try.
2007-01-31 03:04:51 · answer #6 · answered by C = JD 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OK the election was about Iraq, Abramoff, Foley and Macaca. It wasn't a validation of your party's socialist opposition to the very tax cuts and deregulation that have made the economy so strong.
2007-01-31 03:05:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
after we hear it another million times. I don't know what your talking about. Do you expect them to sit in the corner now, and keep quite?
2007-01-31 03:06:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why should we? The Democrats never did when THEY were tossed out on their ears.
2007-01-31 03:06:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Technically they do. Bush has veto power.
2007-01-31 03:04:48 · answer #10 · answered by smedrik 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋