If the media were truly left wing.. wouldn't they accurately report the anti war demonstrations numbers?

Question

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=36339

I keep hearing the number 10 thousand.. it was 50 times that/

Liberal media?

Answer 1

If you do some research, you will find that most American media outlets are owned by conservatives.

Answer 2

Well it says the organizers estimate the crowed at a half million there is no longer an authority that keeps any count of how many people are there. Every demonstration no matter what the cause the people running it will inflate the number to make it seem it was bigger than it was. So you say that the media isn't bias because they don't take the word of the people who will say the largest number they can get away with. If you had any idea of just how many people 500,000 is and saw the footage of the demonstration you would laugh at those numbers.

Answer 3

through fact the Iraq conflict and the conflict in Afghanistan/troop numbers in the middle east at the instant are not the same element. maximum folk weren't anti conflict in prevalent. They have been against the Iraq conflict specifically and it incredibly is winding down. beneficial the united stateswill safeguard a presence there, merely as they do in Japan and Germany. yet they're now not in cost of risk-free practices there and that they have got a heck of a smaller presence than in the past. The Iraq conflict substitute into very high priced in greenback words and in terms of yank and Iraqi electorate lives lost. It substitute into justified specifically on a baseless WMD declare (humanitarian grounds? for the reason that while has u.s. ever fought a conflict on humanitarian grounds? how many humanitarian disaster do u.s. forget approximately. there is often yet another actual reason while they do act. it incredibly is a bull answer and everybody could be conscious of it). Now we see Iraq remains crammed with issues, nonetheless has violence, and we see regardless of this regime put in place, they're doing issues like mass killings of gay human beings and so on. substitute into the extensive value incredibly worth it? Saddam substitute into never a considerable threat he had a thrid international military. He had no wmds. there have been many greater threatening international locations around on the time. Afghanistan on the different hand, substitute into justified as they have been incredibly harbouring Bin weighted down and does not supply him up after 9/11. The Taliban are a terrible regime and if u.s.'s efforts had stayed with Afghanistan i the 1st place, it would possibly not have deteriorated into the mess it incredibly is now. it incredibly is why everybody isn't protesting now. They have been never protesting conflict in prevalent. That substitute into continually a bull assumption from some dim witted authentic wingers who simplify the left and could't distinguish between conflicts. AND it incredibly is not the same challenge.

Answer 4

I'm not surprised the reports are contradictory.

History tells us that one of the most unstable political combinations is a country -- like the United States today -- that tries to be a domestic democracy and a foreign imperialist. The dream of the Bush administration -– eternal global domination abroad with no other superpower or bloc of powers on the military horizon and a Republican Party dominant at home for at least a generation -- long ago evaporated in Iraq.

A midterm election and subsequent devastating polling figures tell the tale. The days when neocons, their supporters, and attending pundits talked about the U.S. as the "new Rome" of planet Earth now seem to exist on the other side of some Startrekkian wormhole.

And yet the imperial damage remains everywhere around us. Give the Bush administration credit. They moved the goalposts. They created the sort of dystopian imperial reality (as well as a mess of future-busting proportions) that a generation of relative sanity might not be able to fully reverse.

The facts on the ground -- the vastness of the Pentagon, the power of the military-industrial complex, the inept but already bloated Homeland Security Department (and the vast security interests coalescing around it), the staggering alphabet (or acronym) soup of the "Intelligence Community" -- all of this mitigates against real change,

Answer 5

The National Park Service takes aerial photographs of demonstrations then determines crowd density and the space the crowd takes up.

These methods are public and have been validated several times.

Face it - the protests were a bust. All you did was demonstrate that you are _not_ speaking for the majority of the American people.

Answer 6

You make an excellent point. That just goes to show that the mainstream media aren't liberal. After all, if any of you remember the beginning of this disastrous war, the mainstream outlets were cheerleaders for the Bush administration. This has only quite recently begun to change. It just seems to me that whenever the media doesn't show an overtly conservative bias the way that Fox does, the conservatives automatically accuse them of being liberal. And not only that, but whenever the media reports about something negative a conservative has done or said, they take it as an indicator of liberal bias. And this isn't something recent, either. In fact, Richard Nixon accused the Walter Cronkite and other members of the media of having a liberal bias because of their unflattering coverage of Vietnam and Watergate.

Answer 7

I think the major news organizations feed us pabulum.

There are many reasons. I guess they want ratings and think the American public is ignorant and has a short attention span.

It used to be that the networks used to think of their news divisions as performing a public service, rather than being mere revenue-generators.

I'm not sure what the bias is, or how many people were at the rallies.

Answer 8

Depending on the media source. As for me, I work at a spanish Network and believe me, we do give a lot of attention to anti-war demonstrations... And instead of saying ...there were 10 or 20 thousand... we say: according to police, there were XXXX... but see the images, and you decide how many...

Answer 9

Did they report that Nancy Pelosi ordered Chief of Police Phillip Morse not to arrest protesters who spray painted the Captiol because it's free speech and then ordered the Captiol cleanup crew to come in on their day off and at tax payers expense clean it up?? Did you also hear the numbers of the paid protesters that showed up? 65%. Yes, liberal media!!

Answer 10

did you know the anti-war demonstrators spray painted the US Capitol with grafitti?
just plain Sickening!
the chief of police stood by and did nothing!
the LIBERAL MEDIA failed to report that.

Answer 11

Who says it was 500,000? Jesse Jackson? Oh, yeah. He's never lied to make his opinion seem more relevant, huh? Were you there? Do you know how to estimate crowd size?

Do you know that the vast majority of Iraqi citizens are grateful to the US for freeing them from a brutal dictator? Do you hear their stories on the evening news?

If you can't see the liberal bias in the media, there's nothing anyone can say to change your mind.

.