Bush has taken responsibility for everything that he had reasonable control on but he is blamed for everything from 9/11 to Katrina. Are people really so stupid to think he had control over all these events?
2007-01-31 02:03:06 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He is the cause of all evil. He has a magic hurricane-making machine. But it's a temperamental machine and if you mispronounce "nuclear" it stops working for a whole year, which is why we had no hurricanes hit land in 2006.
2007-01-31 02:12:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bush did not have control of the events happening, but he sure has had control of the cleanup.
They're STILL finding bones at the 9/11 site, and New Orleans has been forgotten.
You are right in stating Bush didn't have any control over these incidents.
You forget that Bush is still the president AFTER these events, and he has F.A.I.L.E.D. to properly help the American People in the cleanup.
Do you think New Orleans would be in such bad shape today if its inhabitants were White Conservatives?
.
2007-01-31 02:23:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.......i've got self belief he develop into an particularly good President. i've got self belief history will teach that. He did no longer start up the Housing Bubble via giving out loans to those who ought to no longer locate the funds for them. he asked Barbara Boxer on quite a few activities to have oversight of FM&FM. The Democrats wanted everybody to possess a house and that they made banks supply out volatile loans or get sued. Speculators have been given in and all develop into good then the Housing Bust got here and each little thing went to *ell. yet Bush did no longer create the bubble or the bust, it develop into the Democrats in Congress. As for the conflict in Iraq he had the precise comparable intelligence because of the fact the Democrats who authorized us going into Iraq. via the time we've been given in Iraq that they had a protracted time to flow any WMD because of the fact they does no longer enable any of the U.N. human beings flow in and se. The Iraq's suggested NO. so we are able to in basic terms assume that they had WMD or a minimum of have the cheese to make nuclear weapons. in spite of this Iraq is a lots freer u . s . a . and ladies human beings and childrens can now flow to college and not concern Hussein and his brothers killing human beings at will. I additionally lived with the aid of Reagan,Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and now Obama in my grownup years.
2016-11-01 23:13:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you so stupid that you believe a word the liar says. He is responsible for all the bad that has become America. That is his plan, and nothing he says has ever been the truth. He is a liar and his plan is to destroy America as we know it. Why else would he ignore Katrina families, and give away OUR money to his friends in the arms business, to slaughter the citizens of Iraq. Bush, the #1 Terrorist !
2007-01-31 02:22:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush knew about 9/11 and watched for 5 days as Katrina hit the gulf coast. When your the top dog and you have so many people that was killed. You take the heat. Like father like son Bush Sr was head of the CIA at the time and knew we were in danger and got 241 marines and 59 French soldiers murdered and has done nothing.about it
2007-01-31 02:17:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
I guess it is reasonable to call dems terrorists and to claim that if you vote for them the terrorists will kill your family. I guess he took full responsibility for the war in Iraq by claiming that dems voted for it too...even though it is abundantll clear that he has no intention of listening to dems, evident with the troop surge and statements like 'I don't need congress' permission', and 'I am the decider'. So, most of us don't think that Bush was behind Katrina and 9/11, but he hasn't taken responsibility for everything he has done either...just recently he is figuring out what we knew all along...the war in Iraq is NOT going well!
2007-01-31 02:19:00 · answer #6 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Listen closely, I don't want to have to repeat this too many more times.
NO ONE BLAMES BUSH FOR THE ACTUAL WEATHER SYSTEM, GENIUS. THE FACT THAT HE GUTTED FEMA AND THE FACT THAT A GIRL SCOUT TROOP COULD HAVE RESPONDED FASTER ARE WHAT EVERYONE BLAMES HIM FOR.
I know, it sucks to be president and blamed for all of your failures, but that kind of comes with the job.
As for 9/11- he ignored he plan in place for dealing with Al Qaeda because it was Clinton's and this country paid the price. Afterward, he had all of the support he needed from the US and the world, but he DECIDED to squander it by pursuing a pointless war.
So my question to you is: are you really so stupid to think that by changing the argument, you can change the facts?
2007-01-31 02:57:58 · answer #7 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I am starting to think that politicians depend on people to be stupid. That's why most of them get into office. People have very short attention spans, especially when it comes to what their own politicians are doing or even the events going on in the world.
2007-01-31 02:15:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
He has lied, he continues to lie, and apparently he will always lie. In his latest state of the union address there are four statements, he made, that turned out to be lies (oh, what a big surprise), and this is only what's been uncovered so far. Would you want to work with this liar?
2007-01-31 02:29:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
So you think Bush has taken responsibility for all things under his control? So tell me, in a recent speech when Bush says that mistakes were made in Iraq and yet doesn't admit that he himself was responsible, you consider that taking responsibility right? What a joke.
2007-01-31 02:16:56 · answer #10 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋