How accurate is the Mensa IQ test?

Question

Most people know about Mensa and are impressed of its members but how accurate is the test? Does it really mean that the members are the top 2% most intelligent people in the population? Due to the fact that there are books that teach how to score for Mensa test and that fact that many qualified people may not want to take the test.

Answer 1

Mensa is mostly a group for people who are IQ smart but lack practical intelligence. I know several Mensa members who constantly brag about being in Mensa and are otherwise complete losers. One of them is actually a janitor - I believe he was the local chapter president a few years back.

Most of the really smart people I know are way too busy doing real-life projects to waste their time hanging around with Mensa. If you want to meet some really smart people - people who actually have intelligence that accomplishes something - then there are some better places to look. I suggest trying Habitat for Humanity, or a local business organization that does service work, etc. The smartest group of people I ever met was the serious birders at my local Audubon. Every one of them was a big success in his or her walk of life.

Answer 2

I agree. Many qualified people do not care to join Mensa, and those who do sometimes take the test multiple times in order to get a higher score.

Answer 3

i don't understand the Mensa attempt mainly, yet the following is the reasoning in the back of the IQ score: at the same time as psychologists first began to discover techniques of measuring intelligence in little ones (now and again on the rate of awareness it!) they amassed a good number of information about what the perfect baby should be ready to do at each and each age. Then they created the Intelligence Quotient, which grow to be defined as psychological Age divided via Chronological Age x one hundred. So a baby of 10 who finished initiatives that a 12-3 hundred and sixty 5 days-previous ought to benefit should be assigned an IQ of one hundred twenty - 12/10 x one hundred; a baby of 10 who carried out the point of an 8-3 hundred and sixty 5 days-previous should be assigned an IQ of eighty, etc. contained in the early days of this form of diagnosis particular disciplines were talked about that were left in the back of on account that then. case in element, the confirm grow to be not meant to be calculated for everybody over the age of 16 or thereabouts because the concept of 'psychological age' ceases to carry water after this element; also if the ratio for any particular baby grow to be better than one hundred thirty 5 it ought to easily be reported as one hundred thirty 5+ ... as antagonistic to many of the rates you spot in recent times the position X is asserted to have an IQ of 188, or in spite of. So, it type of feels achieveable-free assumption that Mensa has taken one hundred as generic, and hence your score of 128 signifies that you do besides as or better effective than style of eighty% of the inhabitants. regardless of the indisputable fact that, ought to I make a lifelike element about studying rankings like this? because you may imagine of them as supplying you with a ceiling above that you'll not upward push, or a floor less than that you have not any excuse for falling, and questioning about them as flooring extremely than ceilings is way better lifelike and a lot less probably to bring about problems with vanity. Or, to positioned it yet in a unique way, you ought to confirm this score as that signifies that you'll not in any respect do any better effective than eighty% of the inhabitants or as that signifies that you have not any excuse for doing any worse than eighty% of the inhabitants, and the 2d view is way better sensible. that is major that fogeys bear this in ideas in the journey that they are given their young ones' IQs, or that folk recruiting for jobs use intelligence assessments as a way for sorting people.