yeah this coming from the goverment who give themselves a 30% cost of living increase when the rest of the country has 3%, i wonder if he has ever tried living in the real world, not all of us can get free flights and holidays
2007-01-31 00:26:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alik411 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'd like to see him try and live on the minimum wage..
What he gets for his job is rediculous.. ok so he has to put up with people hating him.. but he gets plenty of holidays and is his job really any more important than anyone elses..?
Anyone with training could do the same job..
And Beckham.. what can we say about him.. At least Tony Blair has some measure of intelegence.. Beckham's pay is grossly over-rated.
2007-01-31 10:34:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by bty704613 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I stay in a state with a minimum salary it quite is bigger than the federal point and has unemployment it quite is above the national standard. the two i've got faith are appropriate. i in my view am against a minimum salary era. Employeers and workers could set their very own wages. If a employer ought to place an upload and asked for $a million an hour for an get right of entry to point place and their standard objective applicants are not going to step in the door for below $5 - they might no longer get any applicants or they might discover themselves hiring some one for $5. As that grew to become into their superb grant. If that individual dose a physically powerful interest they might finally end up with $10.
2016-11-23 17:07:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A decent living wage for us plebs is what he meant. Sure politicians do work hard, but they are not scraping up bodies of the motorway or cleaning out a bed in an old peoples home!
The problem is that this government has destroyed all traces of socialism and union protection for the workers. We have a society of greed from government to footballers and a social structure that will feed the rich more and more, creating even more of a division in social classes.
2007-01-31 00:33:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Spiny Norman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats because Tony Blair does not have to live on it!! Tony Blair is sitting pretty and does not care about anyone else except.............Blair!!!!
2007-01-31 00:29:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
insulting. for the lower paid,
ludicrous, in the case of beckham
2007-01-31 00:28:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would like to see tony try to live on it and feed a family...... oh yes its just enough to survive...
if you eat your kids with rice and stale bread and live in a shoebox at the bottom of the gravel pits..........
2007-01-31 00:27:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by wang eyed lil 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
excessive?
fun?
i`m all right jack, keep your hands off`a my stack?
2007-01-31 00:27:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by qwerty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
OTT.
2007-02-03 23:42:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by ktbaron 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bullshit
2007-01-31 00:30:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by PINGU 2
·
1⤊
0⤋