Read this for yourself and realise the TRUTH!
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
2007-01-30 22:39:15 · 34 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
So you believe that the Soviet Union and the USA hatched a plan to give the USA a big propaganda victory.... Why would the Russians agree to that?
2007-01-30 22:47:53 · answer #1 · answered by Holden 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
If the Moon landing are fake than all history is fake because the Moon landing are one of the most public and well documented things ever to have happened. It would be easier to fake the world cup or the super bowl than to fake the Moon landings, although today you might not think that because all the hype and attention is gone now. But back at the time it got WAY more attention than any sporting event does today.
The UFO web site cited as the "TRUTH" is just the same old incorrect crap that you always hear. Two light sources do not make different objects have single shadows in different directions, they make each object have two shadows. Anyone who looks at shadows in a room with two lights on can see this. Shadows in different directions are caused by an uneven surface. All the other "errors" are errors of the UFO people, not NASA.
For the real truth see the sources.
2007-01-31 00:58:55 · answer #2 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe that the Moon landings did take place for a number of reasons. Thousands of people saw the spacecraft lift off. Observatories around the world tracked the spacecraft all the way to the moon. Rock samples were brought back to prove the landing on the moon, and these samples have been examined by Scientists from all over the world and verified that they are genuine samples from the moon.The re entry was also tracked all over the world, and the lift off from the Moons surface. The re entry was also tracked by observatories and the lift off from the Moons surface. Jodrell Bank tracked the whole expedition.
2007-01-30 23:59:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
There are alot of conspiracies concerning the moon yet one ingredient for particular is that the technologies accessible decrease back then made it very almost impossible to pretend a landing on the moon so the landing is extremely in all probability and that i might say it did occurred. Why there at the instant are not any satellite tv for pc photographs? nicely there are alot of links in this website that state there is yet there is likewise a explanation why we have not long previous decrease back on account that. If we landed on the moon decrease back interior the 60s we are able to actual do it now yet there is obviously information concerning the moon that's being withheld. it fairly is nice judgment.
2016-12-13 05:13:07 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, if the Fox Network and two old guys who are making a fortune off this story say that's what happened, why am I to question them and not believe the truth. I really don't believe that the country spent 28 billion dollars and 14 years and hired 250,000 to make a movie and have a quarter of a million people not let out the secret I worked on the Saturn V; I know it was real. . Even Nicholas Cage movies don't cost that much to make.. It's a shame that 3 people gave their lives to make it happen and some people need to believe conspiracy crap.
2007-01-30 23:15:22 · answer #5 · answered by Gene 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Dave star, I too was alive watching it when it supposedly happened, Did yo remember the pilot of the craft saying 20 feet 15 feet 9 feet 3 feet Touchdown, did you hear any engine noise!absolutely not, his voice was clearer than British telecom, try flying a light aircraft today and the intercom takes some getting used to. they looked out of their port hole; not a whisper of dust. The lander when tested on Earth did not have one successful landing everyone crashed!!!, why did we not have a spin off from that lander we have from everything else! I could give you a hundred more reasons
2007-02-02 19:59:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because until its on National news saying that they were fake I'll always believe they actually happened, besides there was far too many countries around the world with radio telescopes following the landings, including England !, and if they have not reported any wrong doings then why should we believe otherwise ??.
Plus at the time Russia was in a race to get there first, and they also tracked it, and if they thought it was fake surely they would have shouted it from the roof tops !!.
2007-01-30 22:52:55 · answer #7 · answered by Richard 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Man, you brits have got to get over the US kicking your arses in the Revolutionary War. We're sorry man... get over it.
Just because you are still a bit sour about all that doesn't mean you have to try and discredit one of the greatest achievements in mankinds history.
And also, you do realize you are quoting a site that starts with "ufos-aliens". I am an aerospace engineer, and I read through some of the site you posted. I have to tell you, they have so many of the FACTS about the apollo craft wrong that I find it incredible that they could even extrapolate the ridiculous assumptions they did.
Because I know I'm just spinning my gears with a mediocre mind like yours, that's all I'll say.
2007-01-31 02:03:05 · answer #8 · answered by AresIV 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
'amused - just curious as to how many of you guys are on payroll. van allen saturated that geiger counter.
the truth is out there.. i suggest starting with the xfiles spinoff 'The Lone Gunmen' - pilot episode
and follow that with the 1995 INWO 'game'
and.. loose change 2nd edition after that...
and some general symbology - 'g' = generative principle (watch origional 'Wicker Man'... and wingedsundisk... and 'amun-ra'
satanic symbol is cultural - OLHP in my experience got along great with the cia kids @ a hacker convention (and the truth on things is basically common knowledge at a hacker convention ;)
no joke - wish it was.. an interesting.. interesting world.
check the pictures.
2007-01-31 13:32:07 · answer #9 · answered by honorablepassion 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was a programme on Sky last night which prats like you should have watched.
It debunked all the stupid and ignorant objections people make about the moon landings.
Of course they landed, do you think the Russians would have missed out on exposing the cover up if they didn't?
2007-01-30 23:16:34 · answer #10 · answered by efes_haze 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe. But then again I find it hard to explain what really did happen? I mean didn't the Americans land on the moon? Why would the government do that?
2007-01-30 22:47:27 · answer #11 · answered by Pichka 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋