Do u think it was fair to adjudge Sachin Tendulkar as the man of the series?

Question

i mean he played well in only 2 matches.He ofcourse led India to a win in the last match but still there were more worthy candidates.say rahul dravid .he played wonderfully well throghout the series.and for that matter even sourav scored more runs than Sachin?Also do u thjink that rahul is always an unsung hero?

Answer 1

I also felt that Rahul dravid was the right candidate for Man of the series. However, However, the the bowling and the 3 wickets taken by Sachin weighed in his favour.

Rahul dravid is defenitely an unsung hero as people are not applhying their mind in assessing the potential and the role being played by him in the indian team and do not miss any chance to criticise him whenever he makes a mistake. The same yardstick is not being applied by the same people when he leads the team to victory, which us is quite unfair.

Answer 2

See when he became the first batsman to score 50 hundreds in international cricket, Sachin Tendulkar established himself as the greatest of all Indian cricketers. Recognised by Sir Donald Bradman as his modern incarnation, Tendulkar has a skill – a genius – which only a handful have possessed. It was not a skill that he was simply born with, but one which was developed by his intelligence and an infinite capacity for taking pains. If there is a secret, it is that Tendulkar has the keenest of cricket minds. At times in a Test series he looks mortal. But he learns every lesson, picks up every cue, dominates the opposing attack sooner or later, and nearly always makes a hundred. His bravery was proved after he was hit on the head on his Test debut in Pakistan, when he was only 16; and his commitment to the Indian cause has never been in doubt. If captaincy – or rather the off-field management of men less skilled than himself – was beyond him at his first attempt, his reading of the game, and his manifold varieties of bowling, have shown the same acute intelligence. His cricket has been played in the right way too, always attacking, and because he knew that was the right way rather than because he was a child of the one-day age, as he himself modestly said. The awe of opponents was as great as that of crowds. But the finest compliment must be that bookmakers would not fix the odds – or a game – until Tendulkar was out but any way Sachin is Sachin and that wat the fair judugement judge by match raferee as Greatest batsman Sachin Tendulkar as a man of the match ans the man of the series....

Answer 3

Referee A G Hurst of Australia adjudged Sachin Tendulkar as the man of the series
Tendulkar---
:He bowled well in the second match at Cuttack
2/25 in 8 overs
,where he scored a duck.
-he had figures of 1/54 in 10 overs in Nagpur,dismissing Lara
and scored 31 off 38 balls
-Scored 60 off 66 balls in Chennai
bowling figures 0/33 in 5 overs
scored 100 not out off 76 balls in Vadodara,the deciding match

Also,Ganguly , Karthik,Uthappa didn't play all 4 matches.
though they played well.
Ganguly played well in the Nagpur and Vadodara
Dravid played well in Nagpur,Chennai and Vadodara,also
captained the side
Only Karthik and Agarkar batted well in Cuttack,all other
batsmen flopped.
It was ok to name Sachin the Man of the Series
Dravid could have well be named the man of the series,that
too would have been a good decision
But still, cricket fans value and admire Dravid for his consistent batting,he was one of the reasons for India's success at the 2003
world cup,where he kept wickets,lending balance to the
team

Answer 4

Apart from the runs scored,he also took 3 Wkts and reasonably contained the batsman in two matches.
But if he had played this innings in the third match we would won all the matches and he would have been undisputed Man of the Series.

Answer 5

i think the award is okay .and it is correct...

he is chosen because of his wonderful performance through out the whole series...
if u play well...compared to others...u will have chance get chosen as the man of the series.
i can't see any other player in indian team who has the right to take the award...yeah..i agree that Rahul played good but not like tendulkar

Answer 6

Ya sure the thing here to appreciate s the team work..If any one of the list u mentioned did not play means we would have lost the series..
So lets applaud our Indian team my dear friend

Answer 7

sachin scored more runs than rahul.so he deserves it. i don't no players have performed well in the series.his ton today is the major & he did play well only in 2 matches.only sachin deserves it.

Answer 8

it should have been marlun samuels though west indies lost he scored good runs backed up by doing all his 10 overs in matches with economy less than 5 and also feilded nicely.

Answer 9

i cant say that is decision is correct. but its ok........

bcos Sachin has scored 211 runs with 3 wicket

rahul 200

i can say that Rahul is surely an Hero.........

Answer 10

sachin is good.
but when its comes to ausezzz he really sucks!!!!!!!!!