English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For one example from the many:

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhuG9tVvgFOwotw_q4HXmgUgBgx.?qid=20070131015453AA3EY98&show=7#profile-info-186a93268eb14e92045e9bfbd21833b0aa

2007-01-30 21:20:21 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

13 answers

Society is sick. Look at Prince Harry and the way noone cared about him dressing up like that.

2007-01-30 22:54:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I think its because you have not read the question or the answers correctly and just read between the lines..... One mentions Zionism which i cant be bothered to write an essay about but what he writes is correct about how it has helped some colonised countries get back on there feet which is hard to understand if like myself live in England and have done the colonising and not been on the receiving end... As for the other comment about Hitler, if you know about Hitler (apart from the mass murder), he did get the country back on its feet after WWI, that's how he got to power and stayed there....My advice to you is read more before putting questions on here... ops, no ten points for me.

2007-01-31 05:33:02 · answer #2 · answered by 2 good 2 miss 6 · 0 1

The worst aspects of the third reich are the only ones that are generally spoken of.Indeed the nature of some of germanys activities are unspeakable and outweigh anything positive.

The subject has to be looked at objectively,Hitler was indeed a great leader who loved the german people and they loved him.He delivered to them(pre war) a life and hope that no other leader has ever been capable of.He wasnt a tinpot dictator with selfish interests.He had nothing to call his own and had no vices.

Much of the rhetoric surrounding adolf hitler is purely propaganda,originally used to rally allied nations to war.After the war,of course, the victors get to write the history.

Of course,the brutal murder of millions will be his legacy.


If youre looking for true murderous evil without justification,try Stalin,
over 50 million died unnaturally during his rule.Many of these in combat but 20 million under his belt before the onset of war.

2007-01-31 05:41:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

hitler's methods or aims can not be used to say he was justified in what he was doing. There were many other movements that have been carried out in history therefore he wasn't the only one trying to fight for a better country etc. He just happened to be at the right place at the right time and thats why many followed him.

2007-01-31 05:26:15 · answer #4 · answered by laydeeheartless 5 · 0 2

The wierdos and losers are locked in their padded cells with only a computer for company, having been denied the liberty to spread their poison down the pub. When the medication kicks in again it all goes quiet for a bit.

2007-01-31 05:25:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Hitler wasn't justified, although he did have a point.

Germany was dying as a result of the massive recompense we made it pay for starting WW1; and the German PEOPLE were suffering...

Hitler took a stance to turn around his country and save his people, and to some extent did a good job - unfortunately they somehow lost the plot and became inhuman killing machines.

2007-01-31 06:03:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Hitler did bad and good things for Germany. I am not saying that he was a good man. I am just acknowledging both sides of his actions. However, I do wish he had never came into power, because he was a sick, horrible man.

2007-01-31 05:32:06 · answer #7 · answered by Ayesha 4 · 0 2

Why should everyone pay for the sins of one. I don't owe those that were tortured more than respect...just as I don't owe slaves for the past...or white people who want a country of their own. I owe the world for nothing...I will pay for my sins when I meet my maker. So f you are attempting to put us all in the same group you are wrong.

2007-01-31 05:28:20 · answer #8 · answered by Wat Da Hell 5 · 0 2

Hitler DID do many good things for Germany, BUT he also did a hell of a lot of bad things as well. Unfortunately, the bad things heavily out weigh the good things.
People only remember Hitler for the bad things that he did. He was responsible for the building of the Autobahns, getting the German economy back in control, reducing mass unemployment and various other things.

2007-01-31 05:28:17 · answer #9 · answered by The Alchemist 4 · 4 4

Hitler was a sick puppy but he did admittedly full fill the promise of getting all into work

2007-01-31 07:25:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers