I know how evil that must sound, but we're dealing with someone uniquely gifted at ignoring what's right and wrong. He'd make everyone in the world happy by withdrawing from Iraq. Then he could send the CIA in there to stir up the civil war, and the next thing you know... viola! A humanitarian mission to Iraq! Crazier things have happened.
2007-01-30 20:40:35 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Invading Iraq WAS supposed to be an humanitarian mission by freeing the people from Saddam. Now they're free. Free to fight with each other and put our troops in harms way. Yes, crazier things have happened - Bush got elected twice.
2007-01-30 21:52:15 · answer #1 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you got that wrong. he wouldn't make everyone in the world happy' just about everyone in the u.s.a and europe happy. but the rest of the world would hate him, and the u.s.a. cause it would start world war three, all of the communist countries would turn against allthough they are aginst us right now so it would not matter, but if we leave iraq free and withdrawl, we would leave a nation to a communist leader to step in. like hitler or fidell, we would have a bigger problem then if we would just stay in iraq, im not for the war at all, but we don't need another Hitler, it would be 100 times worst than if we would have left saddam in power, of course he did not have nuclear weapons made for using against the usa, but bush junior wanted him out of power but that was only because his dad bush senior had a grudge against saddam and wanted him out of power which at that time he FAILED to do.
2007-01-31 05:45:07 · answer #2 · answered by turboblue22 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is well aware that this is his legacy, and I can assure you he wants nothing more than the war to end. Pulling out of Iraq is a mistake, anyone with a brain knows that. It is in no ones interest for Iraq to fail. No Ones.
2007-01-31 04:46:59 · answer #3 · answered by Jon H 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋