I would have to be severely intoxicated to make such a foolish decision.
EDIT: umm, you do realize that Mozart was a homosexual, right? [For example, Mozart wrote canons on the words "Leck mich im Arsch" ("Lick me in the ****") and ";Leck mich im Arsch recht fein schön sauber" ("Lick me in the **** nice and clean") as party pieces for his friends. The Köchel numbers of these canons are 231 and 233]
2007-01-30 18:56:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
It doesn't matter about the gender. It matters how this person will lead the country. For one moment, think about people in Canada, Europe, Australia, Japan, China, Russia and the Middle East who do not want to be dragged into a war. I do not want to see a civil war between Iraq and Iran. Lebanon may be lost. Israel will have to engage in pre-emptive strikes against nuclear sites and hope that sanctions work, just to save itself.
Their situations are not so different. Hillary Clinton's policies are the same as Bush's on foreign policy. She voted for them. Now is the time for real leadership, as in Nancy Pelosi or Barak Obama.
Imagine what it is like to be Iraqi or Israeli right now. I know people think of them as being on 'opposite sides of the fence', but it is the combination of American foreign policy and Iranian leadership, as well as the effects of Hussein's policies and lasting bitterness of the Iraqi-Iranian war and Russia's endless supply of nukes for Iran, that is dragging us closer and closer to this.
2007-01-31 02:57:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-01-31 03:15:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't and it has nothing to do with the fact that she's a woman. I want my president to have the guts to stand by his/her convictions and I don't believe Hilary does. She is always changing her story with the attitude of the nation.
2007-01-31 03:04:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Most likely not..but it depends, as always.. on who else is in the running.
If I had to vote for her though...I would be vomiting while I did it...
But I will *always* vote...vomit... or not.
The right to vote is too damn important! And was fought for at a high price.
2007-01-31 03:35:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by KarenS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No sure no first he should take an anger course then perhaps i think about it. she cant be a good president just because her last name is Clinton. she better think a good job which suits her more .
2007-01-31 03:31:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ali T 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Absolutely not and her gender has nothing to do with it. She is corrupt and dishonest. It disqusts me the way she tries to be all things to all people. Yea, she and Pelosi are both mothers but their children were raised by nannies and they had all the help in raising children possible. I raised four children and her playing 'mommy' at this late date does not impress me at all.
In essence, if she wants to play with the big boys she should get with the program and quit sucking up to every possible group. To vote for her for the image she tries to portray now instead of by her past actions is betraying oneself!
2007-01-31 03:01:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Heidi 4 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't see why not. No one has put forth a good reason why not to.
@ Yeah man!, she didn't "vote" for bush's policies. She may have voted for the war in Iraq, but so did everyone else because of misleading and/or false info, but most people regret doing so, unlike Bush.
2007-01-31 03:39:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Riddler 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
I doubt it... Of coarse, it depends on who she's running against. She might be the lesser of the two evils. OR-just don't vote.
2007-01-31 03:02:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I would. I think Bill Clinton would be good to be back in there helping her too!
2007-01-31 03:02:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bride2Be 8/30/08 5
·
2⤊
1⤋