to be removed from the senate and tried for treason ...what Democrats would be left in the senate ?
2007-01-30 17:11:53 · 9 answers · asked by missmayzie 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Joe Lieberman. But as of late, a few Republicans would be gone too. And we all see how the Democratic party showed Lieberman respect. They forced him to run as an Independent. They say that debate, and voicing opposition is a good thing, but they rewarded him by pulling their support for him. Isn't it ironic that they say they stand for "Freedom of Speech", but when one of their own differs from the rest, they show him the door? Simply Amazing.
2007-01-30 17:14:51 · answer #1 · answered by FRANKFUSS 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Not many! Unless you count the ones that sang a different tune at the start of the war. But if you didn't stop with the Senate, and decided to go after other traitors, you'd take out most of the principal propaganda machine - the News Media!
2007-02-01 16:56:03 · answer #2 · answered by nightracker303 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Jimmy expensive, First enable me say sturdy night and chuffed to work out you. to respond to your question, combating amnesty of 100s of 1000's of criminals isn't treason. in reality, it substitute into extremely the choice. If the Dems were severe approximately this, they does not have linked the dream act. besides, My Little Muse, Obama voted against each investment invoice that substitute into directed at our warring troops. needless to say that substitute into not treason. It substitute into not seen treason while Candidate O interfered with troop withdrawal talks imploring our enemies and allies to not do something till after he substitute into elected. look forward on your next merchandise.
2016-10-16 08:39:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Joe Lieberman - but then he won as an Independent after losing the primary in CT and all his democratic friends campaigned against him and he still won as US Senator.
2007-01-30 17:21:31 · answer #4 · answered by bigej65 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
... ALL OF THEM.
Is this a trick question or do you really think that way ?
I'm pretty sure you have heard of the Constitution, a dictionary, and hearing both sides of an issue... all of them can serve a genuinely inspired citizen... and should be an introductory requirement before anyone post an opinion (or gets a TV or Radio show).
.
2007-01-30 17:34:32 · answer #5 · answered by Knot.Of.This.Swirled 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Nobody helped enemy. That's like saying GOP embolden enemy by giving them more US soldiers to be killed. All that talk with 'emboldening' enemy is just hogwash nonsense. Why is all the large GOP linked private contractors over charging government while soldiers were gathering scrap metals for armor? Cheney and Rumsfeld in 70s wanted Iranians to get nuclear technology so they'll sell us more oil. Why is GOP wanting to send more troops when Pentagon officials are worried there may not be enough equipment to properly protect soldiers and we're sending troops after shortened trainings? They're not sending extra 21,000 troops. Its 21,000 soldiers working over time, cutting vacation short and staying on tour longer. GOP wants to send ill equiped, fatigued soldiers to fight in Iraq and democrats are the bad guys? Rangel was right to call for draft. So we don't ask just few thousand existing soldiers to sacrifice everything for GOP's political interests.
This is about lowest one can go when reponding to criticism by others. By telling them their criticism is comfort to enemy. If there have been more criticisms that were heard we wouldn't be in such a mass in Iraq.
2007-01-30 19:26:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
zell miller and lieberman
2007-01-31 12:53:07 · answer #7 · answered by atlas shrugged and so do i 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am a Republican and we need stronger leadership.
McCain!
2007-02-02 07:58:54 · answer #8 · answered by Harry Merkin 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can sum that up in one word. " NONE"
2007-01-30 17:23:27 · answer #9 · answered by Pommac 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋