Has Bush killed us all?

Question

At the House hearing, two private advocacy groups produced a survey of 279 government climate scientists showing that many of them say they have been subjected to political pressure aimed at downplaying the climate threat. Their complaints ranged from a challenge to using the phrase "global warming" to raising uncertainty on issues on which most scientists basically agree, to keeping scientists from talking to the media.

The survey and separate interviews with scientists "has brought to light numerous ways in which U.S. federal climate science has been filtered, suppressed and manipulated in the last five years," Francesca Grifo, a senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, told the committee.

LOL yeah Nell, Michael Moore and Al Gore fund government scientists.

Is your head in the sand or just all the way up Rush Limbaugh's fat butt?

Answer 1

He almost did but the American people did a flying knee to the face and now we are doing the ground and pound and it appears quite effective.

Answer 2

Who is funding those scientists , algore ? Or Michael Moore ?By the way - are these the same scientists who said the oceans would dry up in ten years ? Take a look . It's been longer than that and guess what ? We still have oceans .
It sure seems that some people think George Bush can walk on water the way he gets blamed for the weather . He's a fine man but lets face it , he can't walk on water . You give him way too much credit for things he has no control over .

Answer 3

Most scientist used to think we were headed for an ice age when I was in school. Most scientist said we would be out of oil by now.

Global warming says the average global temperature change is 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit in the last 100 years. Truth is we really do not know it all comes down to a guess.

Answer 4

Bush hasn't caused global warming, but certainly doesn't want to spread the word, maybe he's actually in denial. It sounds like some here at Yahoo Answers might be.

And Shad, about there being an upcoming oil shortage: do you think that might be why the US is heavily involved in invading Iraq and the middle East, countries that have oil? You don't think it was because of weapons of mass destruction that they didn't have or democracy for their citizens or whatever? LOL...

Answer 5

No.
Here's what Ken Adachi, Editor of the Educate-Yourself.org website has to say about Global Warming:

***

"Global Warming" is a psychological operation, a "psyops", to condition the public to believe that we are going to be in a lot of trouble in the near future if we don't take steps "X,Y, & Z", and do it quickly. Those "steps" are what the Illuminati want us to follow so they can further consolidate their control over our lives-and still make a ton of money in the process.

Currently, former vice president Al Gore is one of the leading baton twirlers in this parade, but you have a small army of propaganda peddlers out there who are working day and night to "sell" this 'Inconvenient Truth'.

The "Global Warming" promotion campaign is very much in the same propaganda vein as the 'peak oil' campaign, formerly headed up by CIA family alumni Michael Ruppert (who has now fled the country apparently), and discussed at length on our 'Peak Oil' index page.

They keep on pounding at these propaganda themes in order to get you to SUBCONSCIOUSLY accept them as true. That's why these lying jackals continuously employ words like "truth", "true", "honest", "sincere", etc.,
while they are lying through their teeth to you. Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Gore, Clinton, etc., do it ALL the time; pathological liars, one and all, of course, but Tavistock-trained pathological liars.

They use television 'documentary' production companies like WGBH in Boston (Nova) or Frontline to manufacture these 'truths'. Their productions are very well done and to the unknowledgeable and naive, they appear VERY convincing
and persuasive, but if you had the advantage of a good education and have learned to think on your own, you can discern the carefully crafted distortions and fabrications that they weave into these propaganda productions. Recently, they broadcast a 'documentary' over Public TV called "Building on Ground Zero". It's the second so-called 'documentary' that I've
seen on TV that pretends to explain how the World Trade Center towers collapsed. It was one continuous lie from beginning to end. It included wonderful computer graphics and simulations, of course, but it was a fanciful load of horse manure all the same.

Somewhere between the mid 70's and mid 80's, they were continuously hammering way at a similar propaganda theme which claimed that chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as freon, were responsible for creating huge "holes" in the ozone layer. We heard this from 'documentary' productions companies and
politicians alike for at least ten years. The story was utterly untrue and was in fact concocted by Tavistock. Big Illuminati chemical companies like Dupont (one of the top 13 Illuminati families) made an awful lot of money selling the expensive substitute chemical which was used to replace the far less costly
freon. Of course, you had to replace the freon in every sort of refrigeration and air conditioning system in existence because it was mandated by law. These laws were passed because, after ten years of propaganda hammering, everyone simply KNEW that freon caused the hole in the ozone layer!

I recognize that there is physical evidence of the warming of the polar regions, Alaska, etc. Some people will argue that it's a normal fluctuation cycle that the earth has gove through many times before. My own suspicion is that they are using secret technology to create the atmospheric warming over polar regions. HAARP is an obvious one, but I'm sure there are other secret systems that we know nothing about.

If there is coastal flooding in coming years due to melting ice caps, it won't happen suddenly and give you a tidal wave effect. It will be very gradual and you'll have plenty of time to relocate to higher ground. I wouldn't worry so much. It's mostly hype.

Answer 6

Bush has made some bad decisions that are harmful to us in many ways but to blame global warming on him alone is absurd.
Did glaciers just start melting when he took office?

Answer 7

It's all WAY overblown. I think we can all deal with the average two degrees Fahrenheit that's been added over the last century. Get a life!

Answer 8

His ignorance and greed may permanently affect the planet. He has actually managed to damage the world.