Ahh, I'm studying this in my ethics class.
If I answer that a good deed does need reciprocation, it implies that I actually did the good deed to get something else. Thus, I'm not really altruistic.
It's screwed up.
All I know is that I do things (good or bad) without thinking. Therefore, I don't expect reciprocation.
I do try and live by the whole karma thing though...
I guess the only reciprocation that's appropriate is appreciation. Not appreciation of me, but of the good deed and recognition for what it actually is. A simple good deed.
So no, a good deed does not always need reciprocation... but some people do things for others with an expectation that they'll be there or do something for them. I find that concept ridiculous.
2007-01-31 15:50:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is how I see it. If you are the recipient of someones' "Good Deed" a simple thank you should suffice. However there are people who do things for others only when their own recognition will be unknown. The act itself is reciprocating.
So....
As for me I ask myself if I would somehow feel used if I didn't get that "Whatever" back. ie. money, help, companionship etc... If I would feel anything other than contented for my ability to help then I wont do this deed. This attitude keeps me from feeling used.
If a good deed demands reciprocation it is not GOOD. It is in-fact a form of black-male. You know---IF I do this whatever? for you... then you will do this whatever? for me.
Thanks but no thanks.
Oh ya. If you happen to be asking for something from someone remember they have the right to refuse you and still be a good person. Otherwise you're not asking...You're telling.
2007-01-30 22:14:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by OU812 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good deeds should be done because of the kind humanity behind them, not for recoginition. A good deed is not truly done unless it is selfless, and wanting reciprocation is a form of "attention seeking" behavior. True good deeds are done because they are the right thing to do....
2007-01-30 21:56:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Deb 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would make it a favour then wouldn't it? Or demote it to just an 'okay' deed. Unless it's a deed for a house...then I imagine someone should pay someone else something...unless you won it in a poker game..then well high card wins I suppose.
2007-01-30 22:08:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes else would you do it?
You do good deeds for 2 reasons?
You want to show your doing something good and hope someone will take notice
or
You think your making someone's day better.
2007-01-30 21:58:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by ArchAngel Raziel 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, because the impetus behind doing a 'good deed' is the intrinsic reward of doing something for someone
2007-01-30 21:55:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by count scratchula 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think good deeds should be done because you want to and if someone does something nice for you, then pass it on someday
2007-01-30 21:51:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tek ~aka~Legs! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
don't think so, feeling good about a good deed is all I need.
2007-01-30 21:57:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by glasgow girl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A good deed doesn't - but if you have an opportunity you should.......
2007-01-30 21:56:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lolitta 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but a show of appreciation if you know the doer is always a great idea.
2007-01-30 21:55:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by burning brightly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋