I was asked this on an interview (investment banking).
You have two companies which are identical aside from the fact that one is all fixed costs and the other is all variable costs. Which would be worth more in a valuation?
My logic was that an all fixed cost company would have a higher beta, and therefore a higher discount rate by CAPM, and thus a lower valuation by DCF, making the variable cost one worth more.
Sound right?
2007-01-30
13:18:54
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Dethruhate
5
in
Business & Finance
➔ Other - Business & Finance