Does it make sense that only one country was invaded for wmd?

Question

Can't any country be a possible threat? Shouldn't Nuclear weapons have been destroyed along time ago to spare the world in the future? Really what is energy going to do if we die?

Answer 1

The party line is that we're going to hit one country at a time until the terrorists say 'uncle'. Of course, with the Democrats in charge now, that's not going to happen anymore.
Too bad. 'Cause the real reason is so very interesting. Seems the shadow gov't's of at least three nations are vying for control of the Stargate technology buried under the sands of Uruk since the days of Sumeria. And there's a ticking clock involved. The Anunnaki are returning soon. Whoever holds that technology will be in the best position to deal with them.

Answer 2

Project Icarus is a set of 12 nuke warheads facing outer space to ward off potential meteorites. Russia also has theirs up there as well, with 12 nuke warheads facing the opposite direction. This is the real reason why everyone was so upset about China blasting that satellite out of the sky. They're getting too close to not only our satellites, but also to what the US and Russia have at stake and neither country will not deal with that well. Can't mess around with those possibilities out there 'cause that's a no no.

Project Icarus was built a very long time ago, just after the cold war ended. It began as a project in one of the major universities for students...and they finished it. It was used by the government as a means of protecting the earth from any 'incoming asteroids'. Only don't think those warheads can't be turned from the ground. They can be and faced at any nation on earth. Between the two superpowers, the world could be inflicted with so much damage, you'd never see the light of day again in your lifetime. So, even though everyone would like to get rid of all the nukes, there would always be that little matter of distrust between nations; not to mention the fact that no one would ever take down the ones in space.

This is the info on the Asteroid Icarus, for which it was named:

Discovered by: Walter Baade
Discovery date: June 27, 1949
Alternative names: 1949 MA
Minor planet category: Apollo asteroid,
Mercury-crosser asteroid,
Venus-crosser asteroid,
Mars-crosser asteroid
Orbital characteristics
Epoch July 14, 2004 (JD 2453200.5)
Aphelion distance: 294.590 Gm (1.969 AU)
Perihelion distance: 27.923 Gm (0.187 AU)
Semi-major axis: 161.257 Gm (1.078 AU)
Eccentricity: 0.827
Orbital period: 408.778 d (1.12 a)
Avg. orbital speed: 22.88 km/s
Mean anomaly: 124.422°
Inclination: 22.854°
Longitude of ascending node: 88.090°

The following are the chapters which were included in the mechanical guide to build the project for protection.

Following a brief forward, there are 10 chapters with the headings:

As such this book probably represents the first detailed plan for the third phase of planetary defence - mitigation or aversion.



1 Icarus
2 The Mission Plan
3 Nuclear Detonation and Interaction
4 Launch Systems
5 The Icarus Spacecraft
6 Guidance and Control
7 Communications
8 Intercept Monitoring Satellite
9 Management and Economic Impact
10 Mission Evaluation

The project is still currently aloft.

If you would care to see how it is depicted, rent the movie "Meteor", from the '70s and they show a good view of it. Russia had another name for this project, but I cannot recall what it is. In the movie, it's called Project Herculies. Keep in mind, however, that the project from the MIT students was handed over to the government, but the idea for a movie came from the creation of the project, not the reverse.

Answer 3

Iraq was the weakest of the nations believed to be in possession of WMDs (wrongly, as it turned out). I do not see any interest on the part of the Bush Administration in reducing the nuclear stockpile. They even floated the notion of developing a new generation of nukes. Other nations fear an invasion by the US similar to what was done to Iraq. This, I believe, is an incentive for them to continue to seek nukes for self-defense against such an operation.

Answer 4

The U.S is the most likely to use WMD's actually it is the only one who has. The only reason it hasn;t been invaded is because the other countries can't agree on a way to beat them. Not saying that there isn't one mind you.

Answer 5

Yes it makes sense. One country was invaded because it refused to follow 14+ UN resolutions after it lost a war back in '93.
And if you try to destroy all nukes, somebody will 'accidently' forget about the 20 or 30 warheads hidden in some garage.

Answer 6

The USA stockpiled many tons of Bio-chem agents and they are still there. Fact.

The USA needs to clean house if they expect to be true Leaders of Freedom on the road to peace.

Answer 7

Yeah, let's go inavde every country that could have WMDs. That would be a totally realistic scenario and would not totally spread our armed forces out really thin. Good Idea.

Answer 8

We Bigfoot people are getting weapons soon to take back our planet from you half chimp and space aliens, they realize they made a mistake ,so sorry ,there weapons will wipe you all out.say your prayers humans were taking back our world.all will be cast into the seas ,your race will be forgotten

Answer 9

the reason Iraq was invaded is because Hussein didn't follow the UN sanctions! please get facts straight.