NO WAY!!! God, I hope she does not become first female president of our nation. It's an embarassment to my own gender! Yes, it would be exciting to have a female as the President of the United States next term but it's more important that the leader of our nation is a great one, so I can wait.
2007-01-30 10:55:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by susie q 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
the final guy or woman for the activity is particularly what we'd desire to continuously be searching for. Having a "woman" President shouldn't even enter into the equation. somebody with good ethical fiber, a intense point of intelligence, good judgment, a guy or woman who's an excellent choose of character. somebody who will embody themselves with the final and the brightest advisers. regrettably, Mrs. Clinton chosen a bent philanderer for a husband and that left the mummy and dad of united statesa. having to describe to their very youthful impressionable infants why the subject rely of sexual intercourse interior the White abode develop into on the 6:00 information each evening. you're patently no longer possibly searching for a intense answer or you does no longer have made the fact concerning what "each guy needs." JFK develop into possibly as lots or greater of a playboy. we are able to probable in no way be attentive to. the enormous distinction is he develop into the President of the USA at a time while journalism did no longer attain down into the gutter to record the information. bill Clinton knew he develop into residing in a distinctive time and taking part in via an entire distinctive set of regulations. regardless of each little thing, he develop into our President, he could have chosen a greater effectual direction! to place the cherry on precise of his undesirable judgement, he had the audacity to lie approximately his strikes! Please! the guy isn't dumb and he knew what he develop into being asked with reference to "sexual relatives." I say, stay away! Write your books and collect you funds from talking engagements. do no longer deliver our u . s . a . decrease back to ethical lowground via shifting decrease back into the White abode!
2016-11-01 22:16:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As an unaffiliated voter I say no more old geezers...we need some young blood with fresh ideas to get this country MOVING again..so all of you had better start thinking about politics as a career cause we got to get rid of this loser way of war......seriously
2007-01-30 10:55:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by imask8r 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO NO NO NO..
She's been a senator for 20 minutes and is qualified to be the president? Would she be any different than her husband that allowed Osama to attack us and not do anything?
2007-01-30 10:54:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bobbie 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends on who my other choice is. I hate voting when you have to pick between bad and worse
2007-01-30 10:53:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Grianagh 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
hells no I have no problem with a female but not that one how bout ann coulter or Rush Limbauch ha ha ha no seriously hillary is a huge pimple on the buttocks of the civilized world. I wouldnt piss in her mouth if her teeth were on fire .
2007-01-30 10:56:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No I just don't think she is qualified. I couldn't stand her as first lady what makes me think that I could stand her as president.
2007-01-30 10:52:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Marenight 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't want liberalism and socialism to keep spreading and therefore no I will not vote for her at all.
2007-01-30 10:57:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would....Bush set the standard for being a terriable president and whoever is our next president can no way lower that standard
2007-01-30 10:54:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by buickbeast 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
it's too early yet,there may be someone else..a lot can happen between now and then.
2007-01-30 10:53:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dfirefox 6
·
0⤊
0⤋