English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Neither.

2007-01-30 11:15:50 · answer #1 · answered by avcons 3 · 0 0

Matt. He's an all around more solid performer, and almost never has a bad night/screws up in the ring. Just because his wrestling is more mat-based doesn't mean he's less exciting or not as good as Jeff. I'm not taking anything away from Jeff, but I'm a Matt fan. Jeff sometimes looks sloppy in the ring, and Matt has better mic skills. Not trying to insult Jeff/Jeff fans or anything, just telling it like I see it.

2007-01-30 21:05:51 · answer #2 · answered by Krimo 2 · 0 0

Totally Jeff Hardy. I especially love his multi-colored hair.

2007-01-30 19:40:16 · answer #3 · answered by Stephanie N 2 · 0 0

Jeff Hardy. He is a better wrestler and he is more approachable than Matt.

2007-01-30 19:37:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

jeff hardy

2007-01-30 18:44:06 · answer #5 · answered by JESSIE 3 · 0 0

Jeff's more entertaining. They both should do more outside of the ring though and develop their characters.

2007-01-30 18:46:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

jeff... more athletic not taking nothing away from matt.. hes good too

2007-01-30 18:42:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

jeff

2007-01-30 18:42:00 · answer #8 · answered by Dream Match !!! 1 · 0 0

jeff
because he can do any dangerous move from the top of the ladder

2007-01-30 19:01:20 · answer #9 · answered by T-mac1_4life 2 · 0 0

the hardy's forever......they both are great......esp when they team up together.....

2007-01-30 18:47:37 · answer #10 · answered by lusty_for_knowledge 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers