2007-01-30 10:18:10 · 10 answers · asked by drow 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
CIA operations follow the same recurring script. First, American business interests abroad are threatened by a popular or democratically elected leader. The people support their leader because he intends to conduct land reform, strengthen unions, redistribute wealth, nationalize foreign-owned industry, and regulate business to protect workers, consumers and the environment.
http://serendipity.li/cia.html#cia_and_cocaine_smuggling_at_mena
http://www.fathers.ca/bush_the_terrorist.htm
http://www.juancole.com/2004_08_01_juancole_archive.html
2007-01-30 11:18:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The I in CIA stands for intelligence.
If someone WERE TO ASK, do you REALLY THINK THEY WOULD ANSWER YEA OR NAY or answer at all?
If someone were to ask, do you REALLY THINK THEY wouldn't have the intelligence to cover it up?
Even if they ARE responsible for terrorist attacks, don't you think that they are doing a masterful job in covering it up?
Pray for the GOOD to come out of this for us all.
2007-01-30 10:39:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As for distinction i will assume in - he closed Gitmo. stable start up. that's greater effective than i'm going to have predicted from the Republicans. supply the guy a gamble - i'm withholding judgement for a minimum of a twelve months in the previous than assessing despite the guy does. that's extremely ridiculous to start complaining the familiar month. Out of the two possibilities presented, Obama grew to become into as quickly as the standard by using way of a protracted way. you do no longer dedicate as a number of the crimes the neocons did and then enable them loose reign for a diverse 4 years - sorry. To Rizzo, i'm thoroughly satisfied he takes the troops out of Iraq. in line with threat you're this manner of human beings who has a coarse time telling the replace between center eastern countries, in spite of the undeniable fact that i'm now no longer. We had easily no objective to be in Iraq. i grew to become into as quickly as offended at Bush for (among a extensive many diverse concerns) installation a conflict below fake pretense. And the "Patriot Act", and "No infant Left in the back of", in spite of the undeniable fact that we are able to shop that for a diverse time. We did in spite of the reality that, have an overly nicely objective to be in Afghanistan - bear in mind? Bin weighted down? the guy who supposedly masterminded the excellent 9-11 shebang? Or have you ever conveniently forgotten that on the realm of the entertainment of the neocons who've commerce holdings in oil companies.
2016-11-23 14:48:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
HA! i do believe america is behind the terrorists attacks..about asking the CIA if they did it? pshh.. i dont think they would tell u if they did it.. theyy of course are gonna lie about it like how they have been lying about everything else
2007-01-30 11:21:28 · answer #4 · answered by ♥ĴỤiiČ¥♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably, but since the CIA is in the business of lying.... and they are very good at it... no one is gonna know for sure any time soon.
2007-01-30 10:25:55 · answer #5 · answered by eilishaa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not me, but you can .
The contact us button is top center
https://www.cia.gov/
But change your avatar first, it looks like you OD'd on crank weeks ago.
2007-01-30 10:31:02 · answer #6 · answered by kate 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They told me that you did it DROW. Any other retarded questions?
2007-01-30 12:02:24 · answer #7 · answered by playdeaux 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not the kind of thing they would admit to.
2007-01-30 10:27:30 · answer #8 · answered by Doug B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they did not do it.
2007-01-30 12:40:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
idk next time i talked to them i will ask.
no one will ever know buddy.
2007-01-30 10:23:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋