http://www.gcas.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7527
It might happen. I have mixed feelings about this. The reason they are banning them is because in the lower states, irresponsible pet owners have released plecos into the wild, and they are disrupting the natural eco system. Most people release their fish into the wild because the fish has grown too large, as is a common problem with common plecos especially. I think common plecos should be banned, because they grow too large for almost any aquarium, and the average person does not know this because many pet store employees lie about the size of these fish just so they can make a few bucks. I think people need to pull their heads out of their rear end and do a little research, and the pet stores need to think about true needs of the fish, instead of just trying to make money. Because it is the many clueless people who are ruining it for those of us who actually know what we are doing and enjoy it very much....
2007-01-30
09:59:24
·
4 answers
·
asked by
fish guy
5
in
Pets
➔ Fish
First it was snakeheads, asian arrowannas, Pirahnas in some states, ect. Now plecos. What's next? Goldfish? If people don't figure things out soon, maybe all fish may be banned in the future. It is time to realize that fish are not decorations. They are living creatures, and need to be treated that way. And they should never, ever be released into the wild, especially in places where they do not belong. Just look at Florida, where thanks to irresponsible fishkeepers, Oscars are destroying the native bass population in the Everglades.
OK, that's enough of my ranting for now...
2007-01-30
10:03:32 ·
update #1
I apologize, not every pet store lies. There are some that are great. But most pet stores, PetCo and PetSmart especially(but there are exceptions to those even), only care about money, and give out loads of false information.
2007-01-30
10:14:24 ·
update #2