Diesels emit half the CO2, so if you're in a panic about global warming, they're the choice. They emit less CO, less HC, more soot, and more NOx. With low sulfur fuel and the new urea catalysts, the soot and NOx output is comparable to gasoline engines. So the answer is that the latest Diesel engines are better for the environment than gasoline engines.
2007-01-30 11:47:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by anywherebuttexas 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lover...is very astounding. His calculations are sopt on, with the assistance you gave. endure in techniques that a US Gal is 3.8 litres (close to adequate), and an Imperial British Gallon is close adequate to 4.fifty 5 litres, so verify you already know which one you're employing to get genuine value. Your question makes use of STG for costs, so i might assume the quantity length might desire to be in Imp. Gal, no longer the U. S.. Gal that angelabe...shows. it somewhat is why British and US mpg figures will variety for the comparable vehicle and attempting out familiar: the Imp.Gal. is a larger volume. nonetheless, the diesel vehicle travels 39.2% further on gasoline that costs slightly over 10% extra for the comparable volume. sounds like an uncomplicated diesel win. endure in techniques, this does not account for the usually larger purchase costs for diesel autos (over their petrol equivalent), and diesel sevicing costs may well be larger: do your homework. using form is plenty extra in all probability to electrify a petroleum vehicle, and to a larger degree. Katie, you do no longer neeed to apply USD to apply miles: the place do you think of the mile got here from? Britain! And the Pound isn't "Europe money", they use specially the Euro, or different currencies for the few countries that are no longer component of the ecu, like Switzerland.
2016-12-17 06:01:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Diesel doesn't burn too clean and is in a much rawer form than gas but cost more go figure.
2007-01-30 09:21:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not really. Sure they get better mileage, but they have worse emissions. However, the emissions are getting better and biodesel is becoming more cost effective and available.
2007-01-30 09:21:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, although with low-sulfer deisel they are getting way better at emmisions.
2007-01-30 09:19:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wocka wocka 6
·
0⤊
0⤋