2007-01-30 07:41:58 · 15 answers · asked by nglmts 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
I appears George Bush would like it.
2007-01-30 07:50:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not only does Roy mean 'King,' like Caicos Turkey said, but so do Rajesh and Reagan and Vasilis.
There are also names that mean 'kingly,' like Basil, Delroy, Gustaf, and Lear. Balthasar means 'the king saved by God,' and Kyan means 'little king.' The list could go on.
I don't think 'King' by itself would go over very well. For one thing, the kid would get teased a lot in school.
2007-02-01 13:17:26 · answer #2 · answered by Andrea 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
King is a good first name for a dog. Seriously...don't name your child king!
2007-02-01 00:07:10 · answer #3 · answered by Enthusiastic Atheist 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know a boy named Kingsley, but no, king isnt a good first name, i think for a boy, Evan is! lol
2007-01-31 19:06:16 · answer #4 · answered by Allure 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not! But I actually know a guy named King Solomon! lol!
2007-01-31 22:52:40 · answer #5 · answered by Bee0917 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you hate your child or something? Just think of the years of bullying and torment he would receive. And make sure you don't have his first name as Wayne and Middle as King, cos he would probably hate you forever! (Wayne-king)
2007-02-01 04:21:19 · answer #6 · answered by Matt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. But it's all right to call a boy "Roy", which is the Old French word for king.
2007-01-30 16:40:03 · answer #7 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. just bring them trouble.
eg: your son's was named KING JAMESON
and one day he enter a commonwealth country, or even worse, the UK....u can get interrogated on the basis of the name alone
2007-02-01 09:24:11 · answer #8 · answered by littlemunkay 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A last or middle, but not a first. Just MY opinion.
2007-01-30 18:42:40 · answer #9 · answered by ♪♫__Da__Man___♪♫ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no......it´s only to real blood kings...are you a real king ?
peace
2007-01-30 16:24:20 · answer #10 · answered by Motheartist 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋