English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-30 07:28:37 · 13 answers · asked by running2adream 6 in Health Women's Health

13 answers

rape, incest, being too young, birth defects detected on time, or because you don't fell ready to have a baby.

2007-01-30 07:56:45 · answer #1 · answered by a lady 5 · 2 3

i'm professional-abortion in some circumstances. i think of that is often incorrect -- or incorrect ninety 9.9999% of the time -- to kill an "unborn toddler." yet i do no longer think of that is incorrect to kill a "FETUS." we are able to argue approximately basically while the fetus will become a baby, of direction. i might say -- for what that is nicely worth -- that that is actual no longer homicide to abort a BLASTULA, that could be a fertilized egg or zygote at an particularly early degree on being pregnant, while the zygote is extremely formed like a tiny basketball and does not have a useful anxious equipment. The blastula has no innovations, no complicated organs or structures of organs to communicate of, and it for this reason isn't something like a "guy or woman," inspite of the certainty that if it keeps to strengthen for quite a few extra weeks, of direction, that is going to actual will start to resemble a guy or woman. As I comprehend it, the Catholic Church until approximately 1860 believed that when the "quickening" of the fetus in being pregnant -- i.e. after approximately 3 months right into a woman's being pregnant -- abortion develop into homicide. although, until now the quickening -- while the fertilized egg develop into nonetheless on the blastula degree and particularly afterwards -- abortion wasn't judged to be homicide. yet then on the 1st Vatican Council, the Church replaced the regulations. inspite of the certainty that i'm particularly professional-abortion because of the fact of concerns approximately inhabitants enhance and the burdens that undesirable pregnancies can impose on single women human beings and on destructive households, i think of returning to the Church's previous regulations approximately "quickening" might nicely be a suitable results of the abortion debates. yet calling a blastula an "unborn toddler" and insisting that that is carried to term below all circumstances strikes me as a merciless and barbarian superstition, one that is damaging to the lives of unwed mothers and assorted a destructive relatives. i think of that possibly this superstition develop into dreamed up via a celibate male clergy partly out of nicely-intentioned lack of understanding, yet possibly partly for the objective of becoming Catholics greater uptight approximately intercourse and greater guilt-ridden. OTOH, I applaud while the Church definitely speaks out against the killing of infants -- genuine infants -- infants that have particularly been carried finished term and have exited the womb.

2016-11-01 21:55:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only if it was discovered early in pregnancy that the baby was sick and if he /she made it full term they would not live past birth or a few days max. This happened to my best friend and it was the hardest thing to go through. Her baby was diagnosed withTrisomy-18 and not expected to live. It is though a very personal decision.
The other case to consider abortion is if i was raped.

2007-01-30 08:00:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

All life is sacred from conception until natural death.

My mother aborted my older sister. I only found out a couple of years ago, and I was completely devastated. She never got a chance to live.

And what about me? What kept her from aborting me?

I was a very sick "fetus" and they told her to abort me. Something (God) kept her from doing it. I was born perfectly healthy at three pounds. Lungs formed, heart strong...just little. I fear for our country, because the blood of these innocent cries out for justice.

One out of every 3 babies is aborted. It's sickening. What are we doing to help these women??? I help a crisis pregnancy center by crocheting baby blankets.

God Bless,
Chris

2007-01-30 13:36:55 · answer #4 · answered by Chris 3 · 1 0

Well I had to in 2003. :( I had to for Serious Medical Risks for Me and the Fetus. If I would have had the Baby it would have died with in a month. Also this was a first trimester abortion. I would never have a partial birth Abortion that is considered Murder.

2007-01-30 07:39:03 · answer #5 · answered by ♥skiperdee1979♥ 5 · 4 0

When I was 8 weeks pregnant at 24 yrs old, I came down with what I thought was the flu, felt like the flu completely. However, I'm usually over the flu in three days or so and I wasn't getting any better by day five. By day eight, I hadn't eaten in a week, and had thrown up every liquid I tried to drink for three days. When my fiance' came to visit me that afternoon, he said I looked like death and carried me to the car to take me to the clinic. It took two IVs to get enough fluids in me to pee an ounce into a cup. It turned out I had an extremely bad kidney infection and was at risk of losing my kidneys. They gave me a shot of penicillin and some to take home with me the next day and an appointment with the nurse. So here I am kidneys safe when the nurse tells me that my baby may be in danger because of me not being able to eat or drink for so long. She scheduled me an appointment at week 12 for an sonogram. At my sonogram, my worst fears were realized, my baby did not have a heartbeat. My body was so weak from the kidney infection that I was unable to miscarry naturally and my blood was becoming toxic. My only choice was to terminate the already over pregnancy, which broke my heart and caused me severe depression. The nurse tried to counsel me that sometimes things like this happen and that I needed to get my body healthy again so that the next baby would fair better. Two months later, I was pregnant with my beautiful daughter. Please people, don't be too judgemental of people who go to abortion clinics, sometimes there is no hope.

2007-01-30 08:23:49 · answer #6 · answered by christibearb 2 · 2 2

It would have to be a medical decision, such as terminating the pregnancy early due to a serious risk to my life or health. Or maybe if I had been exposed to some toxic chemical and the fetus was seriously deformed and wouldn't live past birth anyway.

2007-01-30 07:52:14 · answer #7 · answered by TPhi 5 · 3 1

None i would never terminate a pregnancy a baby is a blessing even if i was raped it isnt the childs fault so i wouldnt kill it no matter what

2007-01-30 07:36:41 · answer #8 · answered by Sawyers girl 5 · 2 0

Incest or rape, or if the baby was going to be born dead or so severely deformed that it would die when it was born, or if there was a 100% chance of maternal fatality if the pregnancy reached full-term.

2007-01-30 07:49:37 · answer #9 · answered by Brutally Honest 7 · 4 0

For me, there is no circumstance that would lead me to choose abortion. Every child is a blessing.

2007-01-30 07:46:18 · answer #10 · answered by Bridgette B 3 · 2 1

If I were raped. Other than that Id have a baby, planned or not.

2007-01-30 07:36:49 · answer #11 · answered by KiKi 3 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers