Abolitionists attacked Southern slaveholders as "sinners" for keeping slaves; Northerners who weren't abolitionists largely believed that these same slaveholders were lazy for living off the sweat of others. In response, Southern slaveholders and their sympathizers claimed that slavery was good for not only for slaveholders, but also for Yankees who made and wore cotton clothes. Moreover slaveholders argued that slavery was good for slaves themselves.
Since Southerners felt that slavery was postive for the nation while Northerners felt it was negative for the nation it is argued by many historians that social forces brought about the violence that occurred in May, 1856. (Keep in mind that the pro-slavery forces' raid on Lawrence, Kansas, Sumner's caning, and the murders orchestrated by Brown at Pottawatomie Creek all happened in less than one week. The telegraph moved news quickly.) Others assert that individuals such as Brown and Brooks drove events. Yet another claim is that social forces and individuals cannot be separted from each other when making arguments about why historical events occurred.
2007-01-30
07:23:14
·
3 answers
·
asked by
ralph c
1
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ History