With the world in such a chaotic state, should scientists be considered more qualified than other citizens to guide public policy.....I feel that they should....if anyone opposes, explain why
2007-01-30 07:21:01 · 5 answers · asked by 2Slim 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
My wife's an analytical chemist with a BS in Physics, so I feel qualified to answer with a resounding......NO!! She's completely clueless to world affairs because all of her energies are focused on....you guessed it....her specific field of study.
Scientists tend to be the most socially detached individuals within their community...you think a bunch of social outcasts should dictate social policy?? Let them run for office like any other politician.
2007-01-30 07:37:07 · answer #1 · answered by Michael E 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Thats why it's called "public" policy.
Scientists already have enormous influence as it is. That's why NASA is a huge sinkhole for billions of taxpayer dollars. Sure, the planet Mars is interesting, but do we REALLY need to go there?
2007-01-30 07:28:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would feel much safer and have more confidence in my ruling bodies if the scientists took over. at least they know what the hell they're talking aboot. and maybe we wouldnt be in so much conflict across the globe, since most scientists are peaceful folk.
2007-01-30 07:31:18 · answer #3 · answered by Warnstedt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The very best WMD was made by scientists.
2007-01-30 07:58:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I want a guy who stares at ants all day deciding what's best for me and my family.
2007-01-30 07:29:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋