good thing or bad?
2007-01-30 03:49:51 · 28 answers · asked by Janey 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Harry Potter is not doing nude scenes anywhere. The actor playing Harry Potter has become a man apparently and wants you to know the difference between him and Harry Potter.
If it's legal, it is a good thing.
2007-02-06 20:00:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey! Daniel Radcliffe is doing a nude scene as they say in the theatrical play Equus, i am going on the 7th of march to see it, but the play is a very good old one and has been shown before. It's a great dramatical story and i don't think it's a bad thing for him
2007-01-30 04:52:47 · answer #2 · answered by helenakaysmith 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His name isn't Harry Potter. He's an actor who plays Harry Potter and he has every right as an actor to choose whatever roles he likes. That's why it's called acting. And I think the people who have a problem with it need to realize that (gasp!) Harry Potter isn't a real person, he's a character in a book.
2007-02-05 06:36:26 · answer #3 · answered by ameerah m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a good thing for him, definitely. If he's okay with appearing naked on the stage, as a challeng for his career, then I'm happy for him.
It's just that, the naked photos really shocked me. I never knew that he could look so grown up. But I still found it a bit hard to accept that 'Harry Potter' appears naked on stage. Of course I knew he's not Harry Potter, but his role as Harry was too convincing for me that I sort of saw Harry and Daniel as one. I also have a feeling that one of the reason for him to do this was to escaping from being typecasted as the boy wizard. I could very well understand why he wants to try other things so badly, I just hope that he won't be so eager to change his reputation that he strays too far from his reputation as a good teenager and young actor.
2007-01-31 04:28:51 · answer #4 · answered by Charlotte_T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He probably feels that he has to change from the Harry Potter image.I guess it can be hard for child actors to be known for other roles than what made them famous,
But overall very bad dnt belive anyone should be playing nude scenes.
2007-02-05 09:31:41 · answer #5 · answered by Ascetic 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its wicked lol he has totally grown up now lets hope his career goes on and he doesnt turn into one of those child actors that we never hear of, He has come so far since he started acting and has done brilliantly this can help him prove that he can act as an adult and wont be type cast for the rest of his life. A small note I dont think I can see him as that little boy in the Philosophers Stone now its very weird we've all practically watched the HP stars grow up.
2007-02-04 21:27:38 · answer #6 · answered by Tiggs 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's trying to break free from the Harry Potter image, trying different things that have no barring on Harry Potter
hey girls do it with playboy give me a break
2007-02-06 10:40:48 · answer #7 · answered by theladymatika 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know he's not really Harry Potter don't your. Daniel Radcliffe. I saw some well posed pics of him in the paper today it may not be a bad thing.
2007-01-30 04:23:23 · answer #8 · answered by truth_and_time_tells_all 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
good thing- he'll never be able to do anything outside of Harry Potter if he dosent let the world know he's more than Harry Potter
2007-02-06 08:37:52 · answer #9 · answered by Kee-Kee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's an adult by law he is also an actor why would it be a bad thing?
It's not like we are going to all take our children to see a play because the actor who plays harry potter is in it
2007-01-30 04:26:30 · answer #10 · answered by thunderchild67 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋