If you had an accident and killed a person should you be arrested for manslaughter?

Question

No DUI, nor speeding nor overt distractions (like cell phones, etc). Just someone breaks hard, you dont catch it that instant, and hit them.

Why is Brandy/Moesha being charged?

Answer 1

If you hit another car from behind you almost always are at fault and get a ticket. You are supposed to be in control of your car at all times and are supposed to travel a safe distance behind, enough to be able to stop in case something happens. Apparently, she was driving too close, was distracted or wasn't paying enough attention so it sounds to me like she was at fault. Since the person she hit died, then it seems to me that she could be charged with a crime. I believe they can take into consideration other factors such as the weather, the driving conditions at the time, the traffic, etc. and then decide if they think she should have reasonably been able to avoid the accident.

Answer 2

Depending on if it was avoidable or not. Brandy is being charged because she wasn't paying attention to the road. I'm guessing she was on her cell phone and was really into it as well. That accident could have been avoided if Brandy had just said she would call that person back or pulled over to a parking lot instead of being distracted while going on highway speeds.

Answer 3

According to the news broadcast I heard, Brandy was talking on her cell phone and driving over the speed limit and never even slowed down. I wasnt there so I dont know but if its true then she is at fault and I think she should charged with vehicular manslaughter. By the way accidently killing someone is involuntary manslaughter witch basicaly means that the courts realize it was unintentional but you should have been more carful. or something.

Answer 4

i think it really depends on the person. and i know that sounds bias but that's what judges do. they obviously need to way the pro's/con's of a situation and form a bias towards the outcome they think is most appropriate for both the individuals saftey and for the whole countries saftey.

again, i say take it to the judge. if it was a good person that just fell into a hard time, i think evidence will prove that (evidence meaning priors, what their doing with their life, etc...) i think all of those things can make or break the person's case.

for example, lets say you have a 24 year old medical student with no priors and no speeding tickets in this situation. the judge is more likely to let them go in a lighter sense than that of a 24 year old ex-con with no place of employement.

it's all about building a case. the judicial system isn't fair. but that's justice. people get what they deserve for the most part, but like i said, it's not fair, it's justice.

Answer 5

she will be ready to should be sued and she or he will be ready to should be charged for involuntary manslaughter. One is a civil intending. One is a criminal intending. She needs to address each and each. you at the instantaneous are not waiting to easily run into the again of someone's motorcar stopped in web site travellers and kill them. you ought to word and understand what you're doing once you're utilising so that you do not finally end up taking an possibility free existence. in case you do take an possibility free life, then it really is involuntary manslaughter. As for a civil tournament. If someone purely comes out of nowhere and slams into the again of your automobile and kills you, then your relatives have the right to be compensated for dropping you. So she ought to pay for that besides. And if it should be examined she grow to be once 'neglegent' in any appreciate (equivalent to speaking on a cellular telephone) then she'll decide on to pay 'punative damages' that could run into the 1000's. existence for her should be a lot a lot less puzzling had she purely been paying concentration to her utilising that day. that is amazingly unhappy.

Answer 6

Yes, because it is an illegal action. You are supposed to drive so that you don't get into an accident through any fault of your own. In the case you described, it is an illegal action. But because Brandy wasn't really negligent, just made a mistake, the typical sentence is a fine (like $1000) or some community service.

Answer 7

Nah, corrupts and dirty the governments and officers and case closed. If necessary, they protect u and help u to bully the victim for u too, repeatly, till u are feeling ok, simple and easy. Anyway, human life is worthless than a piece of **** metal car. Reality experienced from my life in my country.

Money and power rules everything. What the hell.

After mentioning, they created a nice dream with a trolley when I sleep. lol.....

Answer 8

Check out Percy's Song by Bob Dylan. It's about this type of situation, and it's a beautiful song.

You can cause someone to die with your car and be charged with manslaughter I think in just about every case.

Answer 9

It depends on fault, if the fault falls on the person who died, then possibly not. However if the fault falls on the person who survived i believe worst case scenario would be 1st degree manslaughter. Coming from what you said in the subtopics, if the person hit their brakes and was rear ended, the person who hit them would be at fault, just as basic law (falling into the neighborhood of tail-gating).

Answer 10

There are several points to consider. The first is when one hits another car in the rear, the second car is to blame.

In Omaha, Nebraska they indited a kid for murder. He was speeding and drinking. It cost two of his friends death. It really is up to the County attorney.