The question was:
If we could achieve peace would the free economy that this would create ensure that everyone in the rest of the world had enough to eat?
The question failed for 5 reasons.
Britain didn’t understand the concept of “Achieve”
The Middle East didn’t understand the concept “Peace”.
The Soviets didn’t understand the concept of “Free Economy”
Africa did not understand the concept of “Enough to Eat”
And finally:
America didn’t understand the concept of “Rest of The World”
2007-01-30 00:38:00 · 6 answers · asked by leedsmikey 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Calm down "infected" It's called "humour" (Oh sorry your American and dont understand that concept either)
2007-01-30 00:48:07 · update #1
lol
2007-01-30 01:15:01 · answer #1 · answered by k®ì§ 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Tee hee - a bit out of date though.
There is no Soviet Union anymore. Russia arguably now has a Fre Economy albeit a very corrupt one.
I'd also take issue with Britain not achieving anything but I suppose it depends on what timescale you're considering.
Absolutely right abut the Middle East and Africa, unfortunately.
2007-01-30 00:42:36 · answer #2 · answered by Matthew H 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes America does understand the rest of the world..,we are the only country that continually give aid to foreign countries..,because we defend ourselves against those that want to destroy US,maybe the rest of the world should understand that..,including you.BTW the United Nations is as useless as a wart on someones azz.
2007-01-30 00:45:09 · answer #3 · answered by rosierotnass 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Knee slapper...wait, there haven't been Soviets since 1990. Get with the times, man!
2007-01-30 00:41:25 · answer #4 · answered by togashiyokuni2001 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Funny clever and completely believable
2007-01-30 03:59:02 · answer #5 · answered by Xtine 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I like it
2007-01-30 01:49:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋